The Public Mobile Radio Trunking Services (PMRTS) have all along been an
underdog of the VAS sector. As a result, it has been unable to rise to its full
potential in India as in the other parts of the world. This is largely due to
continuing apathy from DoT-the last TRAI recommendations dated January 2003
have still not been implemented. It does appear then that the TRAI too has
washed its hands off the issue. Instead, it is content watching the exponential
growth of subscribers of every other service, and DoT's continuing inaction on
the PMRTS industry. After all, a telecom regulator is only supposed to
recommend-implementing or not implementing is the licensor's job.
Meanwhile, the PMRTS operators continue their struggle, shackled by a
stone-age regulatory regime, a completely insensitive licensor and regulator
which is hell bent on administering an after-death life-saving drug, just as it
did with the paging industry. PMRTS, perhaps, is the only service that is still
licensed on a city-wide and not circle-wide basis. Despite no objections from
any quarters, this, along with many other growth enabling regulations, continues
to gather dust in the many labyrinths of DoT. The joke in the PMRTS industry is
that DoT responds every three years, only this time it is trying to create a new
record. The PMRTS industry is permanently in the representation mode, briefing a
new officer virtually every year.
 |
Vipen Malhotra,
president, Mobile Trunked Radio Operator's
Association (MTROA) |
Success in the Face of Opposition
Nevertheless, the PMRTS industry has recorded better than the historical
growth of 15% in the subscriber base last financial year. This is due to the
dogged determination of the industry to stay afloat, despite such life
threatening policies/regulations in force. As of March 2006, the total
subscriber base of PMRTS stood at over 30,000 subscribers. Delhi, Mumbai,
Bangalore, and Chennai together accounted for 71.93% of the market share. Delhi,
which includes NCR, led with a share of 10,192 subscribers followed by Bangalore,
Mumbai, and Chennai with a share of 5,300, 4,450, and 3,150 subscribers
respectively.
Needless to say, with approximately 25 mn subscribers being added to the
cellular network-both GSM and CDMA-in the year 2005 alone, the number of
PMRTS subscribers is not even 0.04% of the 85 mn wireless subscriber landscape
today.
It is truly unfortunate that PMRTS is not being utilized to the optimum when
almost every other nation has recognized its unique niche. Several countries
have enabled it with pragmatic regulation resulting in PMRTS subscribers
constituting 2-5% of the wireless space. In India, however, both the licensor
and the regulator are apparently apprehensive that such a regulation, if
implemented, will gobble up the cellular industry. The fallacy in the logic is
not visible to anyone here, even when such fears have proved to be completely
unfounded in other nations, with 100% PSTN connectivity given to PMRTS
operators. Surprisingly, all this in an age where 3G services are on the anvil
and we talk of a liberalized regime! It is sad that PMRTS must remain plagued by
the poverty of imagination and the blinkered vision of the authorities.
| PMRTS
perhaps is the only service that is still licensed on a city-wide and not
circle-wide basis |
Superior Technology
It would be pertinent to revisit the role of PMRTS. The unique benefits it
offers in terms of push-to-talk are vital to user groups who need to communicate
in an emergency such as a fire or an accident. It is equally applicable when one
needs to address a large mobile user group at the same time to determine who is
best placed to do a job at that instant. No other technology has been able to
replicate this. In a noisy or dusty ambience, PMRTS is inimitable with its high
voice-level threshold and rugged handsets. No other device permits management by
listening in. Moreover, in a single-site operation, the analog technology is
nearly as spectrum efficient as its digital equivalent.
Woes Unabated
Despite constituting less than 0.04% of cellular subscribers today, PMRTS
operators pay between 8-9% of their revenues as license and spectrum fee to DoT
and WPC (wireless, planning and coordination wing of the Ministry of
Communications). This is in total violation of the spirit of TRAI
recommendations for an ailing industry. The migration to digital, justifiable
only in the metros, remains a distant dream given the unviable regulation.
Further, DoT's insistence on going digital for all new licenses has deprived
the PMRTS operators of several opportunities, such as, starting a new service
even in the upcoming second-tier cities like Chandigarh, where there is no
business case for going digital even in the next 10 years.
It is still not too late. Will DoT and TRAI wake up and take notice and do
what is necessary to take the industry to its realizable potential, which is
over 100 times the size that we see today?
Page(s) 1