So
what if it was the year of cellular services? Basic services too performed well
in FY 2002–03, thanks to the large-scale uptake of WLL (M) by subscribers and
expansion of services in new geographies by private service providers. Limited
mobility gave a new lease of life to basic services, which looked attractive
again.
Market Size
In terms of revenues, the basic services market for FY 2002–03 was
estimated at Rs 28,908.37 crore, an increase of Rs 2,398.08 crore from Rs
26,510.29 crore in the previous fiscal. The segment has done well in terms of
revenues, registering around 9 percent growth as compared to a growth of 4.06
percent in the previous fiscal.
However,
the incumbent operators, BSNL and MTNL, had to take a beating. Their market
share (in revenue terms) dipped by 2.5 percent. In FY 2001–02, the duo had
held around 97.4 percent of the market share, which dropped to 94.9 percent this
fiscal. In revenue terms, BSNL and MTNL together mopped up around Rs 27,427.68
crore. Private operators fared significantly better, contributing around Rs
1,480.69 crore to the overall pie. Thus, they nearly doubled their revenues from
Rs 680.4 crore in FY 2001–02.
Tata Group, in particular, performed pretty well among the private operators
and led the tally with revenues of Rs 609.48 crore. Bharti Group came second,
with around Rs 354.90 crore while Reliance managed to occupy the third spot with
revenues of Rs 316.31 crore. Since Reliance Infocomm service was not commercial
in the last fiscal, the revenues represent only the subscription revenues that
the company collected through different schemes. HFCL Infotel and Shyam Telelink
came next, respectively.
|
Top Basic
Service Providers (in Revenue terms) |
| Rank |
Companies |
Turnover
(in Rs Cr)
|
Growth
(in %age)
|
|
|
FY
2002–03
|
FY
2001–02
|
| 1 |
BSNL |
21,570.00 |
19,481.69 |
10.71 |
| 2 |
MTNL |
5,857.68 |
6,348.20 |
-7.72 |
| 3 |
Tata
Teleservices (Mah) |
369.64 |
252.5 |
46.39 |
| 4 |
Bharti
Telenet |
354.9 |
162 |
119.07 |
| 5 |
Reliance
Infocomm* |
316.31 |
NA |
— |
| 6 |
Tata
Teleservices |
239.84 |
149.9 |
60 |
| 7 |
HFCL
Infotel |
140 |
80 |
75 |
| 8 |
Shyam
Telelink |
60 |
36 |
66.66 |
| |
Total |
28,908.37 |
26,510.29 |
9.04 |
| * Includes Reliance Telecom (Gujarat) circle and 17 circles of Reliance Infocomm, as merger of Reliance Telecom (Gujarat) with Reliance Infocomm has been proposed |
NA: Not available |
|
The top three private groups contributed 4.4 percent to the overall basic
services revenue. However, in subscriber terms, things were slightly different.
The top three groups made up for around 4.5 percent of the pie. Reliance Group
(Reliance Telecom and Reliance Infocomm) has overtaken others and leads the
private operators block with a market share of around 2.2 percent, followed by
Tata Group at 1.4 percent and Bharti Group at 0.9 percent. Reliance Infocomm did
well on account of WLL (M), which allowed it to add subscribers at a faster pace
in comparison to landline subscribers. The company is yet to launch its fixed
line service, which is expected to happen in the third quarter of FY 2003–04.
| Top Basic Service Providers (in subscriber terms) |
| Rank |
Companies |
No
of Subscribers |
Net
Addition
|
Growth
(in %age)
|
|
| FY
2002–03 |
FY
2001–02 |
| 1 |
BSNL |
35,932,877 |
33,415,197 |
2,517,680 |
7.53 |
| 2 |
MTNL |
4,690,080 |
4,542,928 |
147,152 |
3.23 |
| 3 |
Reliance
Infocomm |
958,534 |
Nil |
958,534 |
|
| 4 |
Bharti
Telenet |
371,973 |
160,000 |
211,973 |
132.48 |
| 5 |
Tata Tele |
365,190 |
150,000 |
215,190 |
143.46 |
| 6 |
Tata
Tele (Mah) |
233,397 |
159,500 |
73,897 |
46.33 |
| 7 |
HFCL
Infotel |
111,000 |
65,000 |
46,000 |
70.76 |
| 8 |
Shyam
Tele |
82,265 |
30,000 |
52,265 |
174.21 |
| |
Total |
42,745,316 |
38,522,625 |
4,222,691 |
10.96 |
| V&D
estimates |
CyberMedia
Research |
|
In terms of subscriber base, the incumbent operators still commanded 95
percent share, a reduction of 3.55 percent from FY 2001–02. They had a
subscriber base of 40.6 million. Private operators had 2.12 million subscribers,
of which 45.2 percent went to Reliance Group. Overall, there was an addition of
around 4.22 million lines, moving the subscriber base to 42,745,316 in FY 2002–03.
The figure is on a higher side, considering that in FY 2001–02 there was an
addition of around 3.85 million lines. This fiscal, basic services witnessed a
growth of around 11 percent in subscriber terms, a drop of 7 percent from FY
2001–02.
If one looks at the overall basic telephony base in the country, the fixed
line component works out to be 95 percent. The remaining five percent is divided
between fixed wireless terminal and WLL (M). Out of the total base of 42.74
million lines in the country, wireline is 40.74 million lines, WLL (M) 1.77
million lines, and FWT 0.22 million lines. This fiscal, one can see
exceptionally good growth in WLL (M) as both Reliance and Tata are very
aggressively pushing WLL (M) in their respective circles. Even, on the incumbent
front, MTNL is pushing WLL (M) with an aggressive price structure whereas BSNL
is still banking more on full mobility rather than on limited mobility.
The Catalyst
With WLL (M), it is now becoming easier for service providers to roll out
services at a faster pace as they don’t need to dig roads to lay cables but
can give the connection and then activate the phone at the earliest. This has
helped them increase tele-density in their respective circles from 3.03 in FY
2001–02 to 4.22 in FY 2002–03. The country is well set to achieve the NTP
’99 targets of seven by 2005 and 15 by 2010.
|

|
| V&D
estimates |
CyberMedia
Research |
|
With the acquisition cost of WLL (M) decreasing day by day, the demand for
WLL (M) is also increasing. At present, the WLL (M) acquisition cost is even
less than that of the fixed line and this will act as a catalyst in achieving
the above numbers.
Services were launched in new geographies, and customers had the option to
opt for private operators. The waiting list got cleared and subscriber numbers
swelled. Tata expanded its service in Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, and Gujarat. With
the acquisition of Hughes Tele.com, the company is planning to launch WLL (M)
services in the state. In the first year of its rollout, the company plans to
cover 18 SDCAs in three states.
Reliance Infocomm has already commercialized its services in 92 cities and
plans are on to cover 686 towns and cities through an OFC network of 60,000 rkm.
During the fiscal 2002–03, Bharti launched services in Tamil Nadu and
Karnataka, and increased its FSP circles from three to five.
Bharti launched its basic services in Tamil Nadu and Karnataka in the month
of April. In Tamil Nadu, Bharti launched services in Chennai, Madurai,
Coimbatore, Tirupur, Vellore, and Pondicherry. In Karnataka, the company
launched services in Bangalore, Mangalore, and Mysore. Plans are there to launch
services in Manipal, Udupi, Hubli, and Belgaum.
HFCL Infotel and Shyam Telelink also reached out to new towns and cities in
Punjab and Rajasthan respectively. Currently, HFCL Infotel caters to 23 town and
cities.
The Players
It was a year of expansion for basic services companies like Tata, Bharti,
and Reliance, which commenced operations in new geographies. In terms of number
of circles, the country witnessed the launch of services by private operators in
23 circles. This has led to an increase in overall circles from eight to 31
circles, resulting in an increase of around 287 percent in terms of operational
circles. The much-hyped Reliance Infocomm project finally took off with its
network launch on 27 December, 2002. The company finally commercially launched
its service in 17 circles, plus Gujarat, from 1 May 2003. In FY 2002–03,
Bharti launched its services in Gujarat, Karnataka and Tamil Nadu. Tata expanded
its basic telephony service from Andhra Pradesh and launched services in Delhi,
Karnataka, and Tamil Nadu.
| Subscriber
Base of Fixed Service Providers (as on 31.03.03) |
| Company |
Circle |
Wireline |
FWT |
WLL
(M) |
Total |
| Bharti
Telenet |
Delhi |
38,802 |
0 |
0 |
38,802 |
| |
Haryana |
39,301 |
0 |
0 |
39,301 |
| |
Karnataka |
29,831 |
0 |
0 |
29,831 |
| |
Tamil Nadu |
59,523 |
0 |
0 |
59,523 |
| |
MP |
173,722 |
30,794 |
0 |
203,516 |
| Bharti
Telenet |
All |
341,179 |
30,794 |
0 |
371,973 |
| BSNL |
All |
35,416,958 |
— |
515,919* |
35,932,877 |
| HFCL
Infotel |
Punjab |
61,995 |
17,507 |
32,145 |
111,647 |
| MTNL |
Delhi,
Mumbai |
4,600,025 |
— |
90,055* |
4,690,080 |
| Reliance
Telecom |
Gujarat |
160 |
0 |
97,054 |
97,214 |
| Reliance
Infocomm |
17 circles |
0 |
0 |
861,320 |
861,320 |
| Shyam
Telelink |
Rajasthan |
45,373 |
3,765 |
33,127 |
82,265 |
| Tata
Teleservices |
AP |
98,074 |
65,894 |
100,596 |
264,564 |
| |
Delhi |
1,246 |
9,865 |
24,790 |
35,901 |
| |
Gujarat |
1,916 |
6,882 |
4,367 |
13,165 |
| |
Karnataka |
24 |
15,639 |
9,475 |
25,138 |
| |
Tamil Nadu |
141 |
18,135 |
8,146 |
26,422 |
| |
Maharashtra |
181,146 |
52,251 |
0 |
233,397 |
| Tata
Teleservices |
All |
282,547 |
168,666 |
147,374 |
598,587 |
| |
Total |
40,747,237 |
220,732 |
1,776,994 |
42,745,963 |
| * Includes
FWT |
| V&D
estimates |
CyberMedia
Research |
|
Reliance Infocomm: In the third quarter of FY 2003–04, the company is
planing for ‘enterprise netway’ revolution by providing 100 Mbps Ethernet
links to every desktop. The company is planning to connect half a million
enterprises. It also has plans for providing high-speed Ethernet links to 80
million homes and will help provide convergence solutions like TV channels,
high-speed telephony, audio conferencing, videoconferencing and video on demand.
Tata Teleservices (Maharashtra): In December, Tata Teleservices acquired
Hughes Tele.com and gained a foothold in the lucrative Maharashtra circle. Since
the company was under the acquisition phase, it registered 46 percent growth in
both subscriber base and revenue terms.
HFCL Infotel: In the last fiscal, the company has added around 46,000
subscribers located in around 23 cities. In terms of subscriber break-up, it has
around 67,000 fixed line, 12,000 fixed wireless, 32,000 WLL (M) customers, and
around 6,000 Internet subscribers. On the corporate front, the company has
around 261 customers.
Last year, the company invested around Rs 200 crore in infrastructure and
plans to invest around Rs 250 crore this financial year.
Bharti Infotel: The company has shown a three-digit growth and more than
doubled its subscribers from a base of 160,000 in FY 2001–02. As on 31 March
2003, Bharti had a subscriber base of 371,973. The fixed line business accounted
for revenues of Rs 354.9 crore, of which Madhya Pradesh contributed around 56
percent i.e. around Rs 198.6 crore. The rest was contributed by new circles
comprising Delhi, Haryana, Tamil Nadu, and Karnataka. Bharti’s strategy is to
focus on corporate and high revenue generating customers.
In Tamil Nadu, the network comprises one main switching unit (MSU), six
remote switching units (RSUs), and nine digital loop carriers (DLCs). In terms
of infrastructure deployment, the company has laid more than 1,154 km of OFC and
plans to lay 589 km of copper. The Karnataka network consists of one MSU, seven
RSUs, and 16 DLCs. In terms of infrastructure, Bharti has laid more than 400 km
of OFC and plans to lay another 100 km of OFC and 1,500 km of copper in the
state.
In Delhi, the services are currently available in South Delhi and some parts
of central Delhi. In Haryana, the company has increased its reach from Gurgaon
and Faridabad to Ambala, Panipat, and Karnal. In Madhya Pradesh, it has done
pretty well and launched services in 20 cities.
Forecast
It is very difficult to estimate the market for FY 2003–04 as basic
telephony is dependent on a lot many factors. All the factors like IUC, TTO,
sales tax, do play an important role in pushing the tele-density and also the
revenue of basic service providers in the country.
In FY 2003-04, TRAI has introduced regulation on interconnect usage charges,
thereby laying the foundation of a level playing field. The IUC regime
introduces a new revenue stream for mobile service providers in form of
termination charges. For the first time, fixed line and WLL (M) service
providers will start giving termination charges to mobile operators for the use
of mobile network for terminating calls on their network. IUC has been
implemented from Ist May 2003.
| VPT
Status of Service Providers |
| Companies |
Target |
Target
Achieved |
%age |
| BSNL |
537,456 |
504,945* |
93.95 |
| Bharti
Telenet |
16,500 |
450* |
2.72 |
| HFCL
Infotel |
5,442 |
831* |
15.27 |
| Tata
Teleservices (Mah) |
25,760 |
1,450# |
5.62 |
| Reliance
Telecom |
8,635 |
3,873# |
44.84 |
| Shyam
Telelink |
31,834 |
737# |
2.31 |
| Tata
Teleservices |
9,635 |
1,314# |
13.63 |
| Total
(public+private) |
635,262 |
513,600 |
80.84 |
| # VPT status as on 28.02.2003 |
*VPT status as on 31.03.2003 |
| V&D
estimates |
CyberMedia
Research |
|
Simultaneously TRAI has implemented new Telecommunication Tariff Order, 1999
whereby monthly rentals have increased and free and discounted rate calls have
reduced. In addition pulse duration of local calls has been revised downwards.
Due to this customer has become very choosy and depending upon whoever provides
the best offer both in basic and cellular, the customer is opting for the best
so one can see a lot of churn happening in both basic and cellular.
In the WLL (M) case, the Supreme Court has set aside the order of TDSAT and
has remanded back the matter to TDSAT for reconsideration with special emphasis
on the question of level playing field. TDSAT has heard the case and the final
decision is awaited soon. So, once the decision is out one has to revisit the
forecast depending upon what impact the decision will make to basic services and
how is it going to impact related segment like cellular services.
On the sales tax front, service providers are being asked by state
governments to pay sales tax retrospectively, which is in addition to the 5
percent service tax paid by the service providers Service providers has moved
Supreme Court against various state governments’ demand that telecom service
providers should pay sales tax. The court has issued a show cause notice to all
the governments, states, central and union territories, on BSNL’s plea seeking
stay on imposition of sales tax.
Telecom companies already pay service tax, which is going to be raised to 8
per cent (from 5 per cent) as announced in the Budget and sales tax in the
country varies from 4-12 per cent in various states. This can have a great
impact on service providers.
If one considers all these factors it is forecasted that basics services will
grow by around 8 to 10 percent in FY 2003-04.
Pravin Prashant
Page(s) 1