The overall enterprise voice solutions market size in India for the FY 2002–03 was estimated at Rs 820 crore. PBX remains the dominant contributor to the voice
solutions market with an estimated business of Rs 450 crore, which was the same
as in the previous year. The KTS market is estimated at Rs 50 crore. The rest
was shared by IP-PBX, wireless PBX (DECT) and other call center components. The
year 2002–03 saw Tata Telecom emerging as the dominant player, edging past
Siemens and recording a revenue of Rs 244 crore, which formed 75 percent of the
company’s total sales last year. As a strategy, the company increased its
focus on services, which formed a major chunk of its revenues.
Most
of the players benefited from the call center boom. This can be gauged from the
fact that Tata Telecom did a business of Rs 86.21 crore by supplying to call
centers alone with orders worth Rs 23.10 from Dell International Services and Rs
14.24 crore from Reliance.
| Major
Customer Wins |
| Vendor |
Customers |
| Tata
Telecom |
Dell
International Services, Reliance, Wipro Spectramind, ICICI Bank, JP
Morgan, Intelenet, Daksh, Patni Computers, Epicenter Technologies |
| Nortel |
Hinduja
TMT, HCL BPO Services, Digital Global Soft, Progeon, ICICIOnesource,
CitiBank, Stanchart |
| Ericsson |
ICICI
Bank (4,000 lines), IIT Kanpur (5,500 lines) Sahara Corporation (3,000
lines), Accenture and BHEL Trichy. |
| Alcatel |
STMicroelectronics,
Paharpur Business, JMI, HSBC, IIT Delhi (3,000 lines) |
| Cisco |
Transworks
(400 seats ) Phoenix Global Interactions |
| Siemens |
NA |
The fiscal also saw the completion of a deal between Alcatel and the local
management of Alcatel’s networking business in India called ABS India. The
company, which sells OmniPCX Office for small and medium businesses (SMBs) and
OmniPCX 4400 for large operations, managed to do a business of Rs 50 crore. On
the other hand, Nortel, another leading player in the enterprise voice market,
recently created an enterprise business group focusing on product development
and sale of traditional and IP voice gear besides offering integration
solutions. Hinduja decided to deploy Nortel’s enterprise call center solutions
to its BPO unit in Bangalore with about 600 seats. South Indian Bank also chose
to deploy Nortel Networks’ converged IP solution to connect 150 branches in
India. Cisco deployed its IPCC solutions at Transworks, Accenture, and Phonix
and did a business of around Rs 15 crore.
| IP
Is Here, and It’s the Future |
| IP-enabled
and pure IP voice and data switches are the talk of the town. While an
IP-enabled EPABX is basically a circuit switch with an IP interface, a
pure IP EPABX is designed based on an IP platform. While both can enable
VoIP, the former would permit a limited number of communication channels
over IP and would require an intervening operator. Also, adding an IP line
card into the EPABX shelf would offer no real advantage since all the
drawbacks of the existing TDM platform of the EPABX, viz. limited
scalability, high cost of integration and high administration and
management costs remain. |
|
On the
other hand, a pure IP-based platform would incorporate RAS functionality
and will allocate a unique IP address for each telephone, thereby
permitting free and transparent connectivity with the IP world, with the
need for an intervening operator. The key point here is that IP offers
unlimited functionality and applications that an enterprise would surely
need for achieving its business goals more efficiently and
cost-effectively. For example, an IP EPABX would allow companies to do
such things as video-conferencing and unified messaging from a single
platform. More importantly, upgrades are easy and less costly on
nonproprietary, open-standard platforms, on which IP-EPABXs are based,
unlike the traditional switches that rely on vendor-owned closed and
proprietary standards. This essentially means that if an enterprise wants
to integrate new applications into the solution, it can always look for
any vendor. On the other hand, the traditional EPABX, with their closed
and proprietary architecture, bind the user to one vendor for all adds and
changes. |
| Going
the IP way is giving organizations a competitive edge over their
competitors. Even though initial investments are still high, IP does help
in reducing costs by offering single network advantage from day one,
leveraging existing WAN for intra office traffic, lower costs of moves
adds and changes and management. Moreover, it can also facilitate a truly
mobile enterprise as it enables employees to access applications and full
functionalities from anywhere in the world. IP also offers better disaster
management capabilities that can ensure business continuity in case of a
disaster. |
Siemens’s enterprise networks division (ICN EN) launched HiPath 3000, a
next-generation EPABX/KTS, as the company did some good business. While orders
grew by 25 percent and revenues were up 24 percent over the previous year,
profits improved substantially. Apart from HiPath 3000, ICN EN launched several
new offerings such as the HiPath Procenter, a call center suite, and Optipoint
500—a next-generation Workpoints family. ICN EN also forged alliances with
Talisma in the call center segment and with Avhan to offer call center CRM
solutions to be integrated into the Siemens Procenter call center suite.
Nortel Networks, whose product lines Meridien I and Succesion CSE 1000
platform suffered some erosion in their acceptance, launched Succession CSE MX
server, with IP telephony features. Release 2 of Succession 1000 with increased
functionality did manage to get some acceptability. The march towards IP
enablement gained some momentum with a number of call centers and some
corporates going for IP-enabled voice solutions. According to Frost &
Sullivan, the market for IP PBX will grow from its present 2.7 percent of the
total PBX market revenues to almost 84.4 percent in 2007. The Asia-Pacific
market, according to the same report for IP PBX, will be worth $1.55 billion by
2007. NEC, recognizing the importance of IP, and the lead taken by Avaya and
Nortel, launched its IP PBX known as the NEAX 2000 Internet Protocol Server (IPS).
IP Makes Some Headway
Cisco led in terms of total IP deployments. The other big slice of the pie
was shared by Avaya and Nortel. While Cisco gained in terms of its acceptability
as a leading IPBX vendor, its support for analog systems did not offer
cost-effectiveness, thus leading to lower uptake of IP. According to analysts,
while Cisco is better placed in the short-term market, its success depends on
whether it enhances the CallManager’s generic software package.
 |
| V&D
estimates |
CyberMedia
Research |
|
Outlook for 2003–04
As most of the call centers are in the ramp-up mode and consolidations are
bound to happen, there won’t be major new purchases. The demand for IP-PBX is
growing day by day and industry pundits are of the view that the equipment will
form the next wave in the enterprise voice equipment market. It would be too
early to say that the market is moving towards IP, as there has been only a
marginal increase in IP deployment. However, the coming year is likely to see an
increase in the deployment of IP-enabled systems. As the market grows, it is
expected that prices of IP-based solutions will fall and the gap with the
traditional PBX will get narrower. WPBX market, wherein Ericsson is one of the
leaders, is expected to gain momentum in the next few years. Siemens plans to
introduce a number of highly innovative products and solutions in the areas of
call centers, cordless mobility, and convergent voice, data and video
communications in the coming year.
The conventional PBX market may record a negative growth, it is opined, given
the tilt towards IP. This may lead to a further decline in the per port pricing.
On the regulatory front, much is to be done. Currently, the government prevents
combining of the two networks and IP telephony is permitted only for CUG.
Sudesh Prasad
Page(s) 1