In FY 2002–03, the optical transmission equipment market in India was
estimated to be around Rs 783 crore. While estimating the market, we have not
taken the BSNL deal as it has spilled into the next fiscal and is currently
undergoing type approval. The BSNL DWDM is a large deal and the order value is
in the range of Rs 226 crore. In case of the VSNL deal, we have taken a small
portion of the total value as the project was bagged by NEC in February 2003 and
would be over in a couple of months from now. In the overall estimation of
transmission equipment market, we have not taken the submarine cable deal of
i2i, a JV of SingTel and Bharti Group. Others include companies like Nokia, ECI,
Fiberhome Telecommunications Technologies, and others. Since Voice&Data is
estimating the market for the first time, it is difficult to estimate the growth
over the previous fiscal.
In
FY 2002–03, a large number of SDH projects got completed in comparison to DWDM.
According to V&D estimates, SDH will contribute 65–70 percent whereas DWDM
will contribute 30–35 percent. It is expected that in FY 2003–04, SDH:DWDM
will be in 55:45 ratio as BSNL has already bought around Rs 226 crore of DWDM in
FY 2002–03 to be implemented in 2003–04.
The Players
If we look at the worldwide optical transmission market, the top three
players are, Alcatel, Lucent, and Nortel. But if we look at the Indian market,
then only Nortel is active in the market and has done exceptionally well,
whereas Lucent and Alcatel are hardly visible. The reason for the other two not
being present can be attributed to lower prices and lower margins. Prices have
further fallen with the coming of Chinese players like Huawei and ZTE. In the
transmission market, Chinese players have done well on the incumbent front. But
these would be accounted in FY 2003–04.
| Top
Players in Transmission |
| Rank |
Companies |
Revenue
(in Rs Cr) |
Market
Share (in %age) |
| 1 |
Nortel |
322.00 |
41.10 |
| 2 |
Fibcom |
150 |
19.2 |
| 3 |
Siemens |
59 |
7.5 |
| 4 |
Tellabs |
50 |
6.4 |
| 5 |
ITI |
45 |
5.7 |
| 6 |
Huawei |
35 |
4.5 |
| 7 |
NEC |
25 |
3.2 |
| 8 |
Marconi |
23 |
3 |
| 9 |
Tejas |
24 |
3 |
| |
Others |
50 |
6.4 |
| |
Total |
783 |
100 |
| V&D
estimates |
CyberMedia
Research |
|
Among the Top 3 players in the optical transmission space, only Nortel has
done exceptionally well in the Indian market whereas others have not even made
their presence felt. The company led the Indian market by bagging the majority
of large deals announced in FY 2002–03.
Siemens bagged a small portion of the Bharti order and Marconi bagged the
Tata Teleservices order. Alcatel was unable to bag any major deal in the optical
transmission space.
There have been new players like Fiber Home Technologies Group from China and
ECI from Israel. Fiber Home Technologies Group has executed some projects for
GAIL and is looking for a right partner in the country with plans to focus on
utility companies. On the other hand, ECI has done small amount of business
through cellular operators. Initially, the company had L&T and NDC as its
partners in India. But with NDC pulling out of India, the company has tied up
with Clovertel. Currently, the ECI focus in India is restricted to cellular
service providers.
In terms of market share, Nortel is a clear leader with around 41 percent
market share. It netted a transmission revenue of around Rs 322 crore. The
company has a dominant share in the Indian market. Fibcom, a JV of Tellabs, IFU,
and ITI has done well by netting a revenue of Rs 150 crore and a market share of
around 19 percent. Fibcom has a strong foothold in the Railways and oil and gas
sector where there is a good deal of transmission equipment deployment. Others
in Top 5 include: Siemens—7.5 percent, Tellabs—6.4 percent, and ITI—5.7
percent. Chinese companies Huawei and ZTE did not do well this time as BSNL
order would be executed in FY 2003–04. Companies like Marconi, NEC, and Tejas
also did some business from India.
| Companies
At a Glance |
| Companies |
USP |
| Nortel |
Majority
share in the Indian market and is focussed more on private operators.
Bagged large deals from Reliance, Bharti, and GAIL. Yet to open its
account in the incumbent sector. |
| Fibcom |
Indian
company having its manufacturing base in Gurgaon. Successful on the
private operator front, railways, and oil & gas. It has recently
bagged second phase deployment of GAIL. |
| Siemens |
Belongs
to the Top 5 Club worldwide. Has been able to maintain a similar position
in India. Has been successful on the Bharti front. |
| Tellabs |
Active
in the utilities sector but has not been able to make inroads in the NLD
space. |
| Huawei |
Chinese
company moving at a fast pace by bagging large contracts
for the incumbent operator and has also made its mark in the
utility sector. |
| ZTE |
Active
in the BSNL space and would be a strong player in FY 2003-04. |
| Tejas |
Successful
on the utility front. |
| Marconi |
With
Alcatel and Siemens keeping a low profile in the Indian market, Marconi
has been successful only with Tata Teleservices. |
| NEC |
Opened
its account in India by bagging a large VSNL order which would be
implemented in this fiscal. |
Fiber Home is focussing on both DWDM and SDH products. The company has
executed lot of big projects in China and want to replicate it in India and is
presently focussing on railways and utility sector. ECI is focussing on P-telcos.
The Catalysts
Reliance Infocomm is building a large nationwide backbone, which will cover
2,000 cities and almost all the villages. In terms of OFC, the company has
deployed 30,000 km.
On the other hand, VSNL gave a large order to NEC for constructing its
nationwide backbone. VSNL is in the process of rolling out 5,000 km of network
and plans are to go for a 12,000 km network. Even Bharti expanded its network in
all the major cities and is presently covering around 24,000 km. With drop in
STD/ISD tariff, BSNL’s traffic has increased. In order to accommodate the
increase in traffic, the company has bought large quantities of DWDM equipment.
Even the public utility companies are either augmenting or setting up their
networks. In FY 2002–03, Railtel, GAIL, and PGCIL were very aggressive in
their rollouts. Railtel was deploying OFC in around 11,000 km whereas GAIL
deployed a good amount of OFC in FY 2002–03.
The Trends
India is one of the lowest price markets and it is at par or higher than
that of China. If one compares the prices of optical transmission equipment,
they were the same as in FY 2001–02. The prices had reached rock bottom in FY
2001-02. But if one looks at SDH and DWDM prices, there has not been much change
in SDH but DWDM prices have reduced by around 15–20 percent with the coming of
Chinese players like Huawei and ZTE. And the Chinese players have become very
aggressive in terms of price.
The majority of transmission equipment was bought by long-distance carriers
and public utility companies. Cellular and basic service providers also
contributed a small portion to the overall kitty. Railways, and oil and gas were
some other verticals that placed orders.
The Outlook
In FY 2003–04, the optical transmission equipment market will drop or
remain stagnant. Much will depend on how Reliance expands its geography and the
number of new subscribers that get added every month. BSNL would be the largest
contributor to the overall pie as it is planning to buy SDH equipment and the
existing DWDM order will also get completed this fiscal. Expansion orders will
be released from Bharti, Tata, and other cellular operators.
Prices of SDH and DWDM equipment will remain constant. Major changes in
pricing strategies are unlikely. However, Chinese companies will give good fight
to Nortel in new tenders.
There have been talks about the metro network, which is very popular in the
US and Europe. There is a possibility that of some deployment in 2003–04 or
2004–05. The network will help in providing multiple services like TDM, ATM,
Ethernet, and data services. Currently, the capacity is not large and even the
prices are on a higher side. So operators opt for CWDM as it reduces the cost of
deployment while providing similar functionality.
Pravin Prashant
Page(s) 1