Saturday, February 11, 2012
Google  
Web voicendata.com
 RSS | Archive    
 Home > V & D 100 > V&D100 - 2003 > TRANSMISSION: Predominantly SDH
  V&D100 - 2003
TRANSMISSION: Predominantly SDH
Most of the orders—placed by long-distance carriers and utility cos—were in the SDH space 
Pravin Prashant
Tuesday, June 24, 2003
Print Comment Email DiggDigg DeliciousDel.icio.us RedittReddit

In FY 2002–03, the optical transmission equipment market in India was estimated to be around Rs 783 crore. While estimating the market, we have not taken the BSNL deal as it has spilled into the next fiscal and is currently undergoing type approval. The BSNL DWDM is a large deal and the order value is in the range of Rs 226 crore. In case of the VSNL deal, we have taken a small portion of the total value as the project was bagged by NEC in February 2003 and would be over in a couple of months from now. In the overall estimation of transmission equipment market, we have not taken the submarine cable deal of i2i, a JV of SingTel and Bharti Group. Others include companies like Nokia, ECI, Fiberhome Telecommunications Technologies, and others. Since Voice&Data is estimating the market for the first time, it is difficult to estimate the growth over the previous fiscal.

In FY 2002–03, a large number of SDH projects got completed in comparison to DWDM. According to V&D estimates, SDH will contribute 65–70 percent whereas DWDM will contribute 30–35 percent. It is expected that in FY 2003–04, SDH:DWDM will be in 55:45 ratio as BSNL has already bought around Rs 226 crore of DWDM in FY 2002–03 to be implemented in 2003–04.

The Players
If we look at the worldwide optical transmission market, the top three players are, Alcatel, Lucent, and Nortel. But if we look at the Indian market, then only Nortel is active in the market and has done exceptionally well, whereas Lucent and Alcatel are hardly visible. The reason for the other two not being present can be attributed to lower prices and lower margins. Prices have further fallen with the coming of Chinese players like Huawei and ZTE. In the transmission market, Chinese players have done well on the incumbent front. But these would be accounted in FY 2003–04.

Top Players in Transmission
Rank Companies Revenue (in Rs Cr) Market Share (in %age)
1 Nortel 322.00 41.10
2 Fibcom 150 19.2
3 Siemens 59 7.5
4 Tellabs 50 6.4
5 ITI 45 5.7
6 Huawei 35 4.5
7 NEC 25 3.2
8 Marconi 23 3
9 Tejas 24 3
  Others 50 6.4
  Total 783 100
V&D estimates

CyberMedia Research

Among the Top 3 players in the optical transmission space, only Nortel has done exceptionally well in the Indian market whereas others have not even made their presence felt. The company led the Indian market by bagging the majority of large deals announced in FY 2002–03.

Siemens bagged a small portion of the Bharti order and Marconi bagged the Tata Teleservices order. Alcatel was unable to bag any major deal in the optical transmission space.

There have been new players like Fiber Home Technologies Group from China and ECI from Israel. Fiber Home Technologies Group has executed some projects for GAIL and is looking for a right partner in the country with plans to focus on utility companies. On the other hand, ECI has done small amount of business through cellular operators. Initially, the company had L&T and NDC as its partners in India. But with NDC pulling out of India, the company has tied up with Clovertel. Currently, the ECI focus in India is restricted to cellular service providers.

In terms of market share, Nortel is a clear leader with around 41 percent market share. It netted a transmission revenue of around Rs 322 crore. The company has a dominant share in the Indian market. Fibcom, a JV of Tellabs, IFU, and ITI has done well by netting a revenue of Rs 150 crore and a market share of around 19 percent. Fibcom has a strong foothold in the Railways and oil and gas sector where there is a good deal of transmission equipment deployment. Others in Top 5 include: Siemens—7.5 percent, Tellabs—6.4 percent, and ITI—5.7 percent. Chinese companies Huawei and ZTE did not do well this time as BSNL order would be executed in FY 2003–04. Companies like Marconi, NEC, and Tejas also did some business from India.

Companies At a Glance
Companies USP
Nortel Majority share in the Indian market and is focussed more on private operators. Bagged large deals from Reliance, Bharti, and GAIL. Yet to open its account in the incumbent sector.
Fibcom Indian company having its manufacturing base in Gurgaon. Successful on the private operator front, railways, and oil & gas. It has recently bagged second phase deployment of GAIL.
Siemens Belongs to the Top 5 Club worldwide. Has been able to maintain a similar position in India. Has been successful on the Bharti front.
Tellabs Active in the utilities sector but has not been able to make inroads in the NLD space.   
Huawei Chinese company moving at a fast pace by bagging large contracts  for the incumbent operator and has also made its mark in the utility sector.   
ZTE Active in the BSNL space and would be a strong player in FY 2003-04. 
Tejas Successful on the utility front. 
Marconi With Alcatel and Siemens keeping a low profile in the Indian market, Marconi has been successful only with Tata Teleservices.
NEC Opened its account in India by bagging a large VSNL order which would be implemented in this fiscal.

Fiber Home is focussing on both DWDM and SDH products. The company has executed lot of big projects in China and want to replicate it in India and is presently focussing on railways and utility sector. ECI is focussing on P-telcos.

The Catalysts
Reliance Infocomm is building a large nationwide backbone, which will cover 2,000 cities and almost all the villages. In terms of OFC, the company has deployed 30,000 km.

On the other hand, VSNL gave a large order to NEC for constructing its nationwide backbone. VSNL is in the process of rolling out 5,000 km of network and plans are to go for a 12,000 km network. Even Bharti expanded its network in all the major cities and is presently covering around 24,000 km. With drop in STD/ISD tariff, BSNL’s traffic has increased. In order to accommodate the increase in traffic, the company has bought large quantities of DWDM equipment.

Even the public utility companies are either augmenting or setting up their networks. In FY 2002–03, Railtel, GAIL, and PGCIL were very aggressive in their rollouts. Railtel was deploying OFC in around 11,000 km whereas GAIL deployed a good amount of OFC in FY 2002–03.

The Trends
India is one of the lowest price markets and it is at par or higher than that of China. If one compares the prices of optical transmission equipment, they were the same as in FY 2001–02. The prices had reached rock bottom in FY 2001-02. But if one looks at SDH and DWDM prices, there has not been much change in SDH but DWDM prices have reduced by around 15–20 percent with the coming of Chinese players like Huawei and ZTE. And the Chinese players have become very aggressive in terms of price.

The majority of transmission equipment was bought by long-distance carriers and public utility companies. Cellular and basic service providers also contributed a small portion to the overall kitty. Railways, and oil and gas were some other verticals that placed orders.

The Outlook
In FY 2003–04, the optical transmission equipment market will drop or remain stagnant. Much will depend on how Reliance expands its geography and the number of new subscribers that get added every month. BSNL would be the largest contributor to the overall pie as it is planning to buy SDH equipment and the existing DWDM order will also get completed this fiscal. Expansion orders will be released from Bharti, Tata, and other cellular operators.

Prices of SDH and DWDM equipment will remain constant. Major changes in pricing strategies are unlikely. However, Chinese companies will give good fight to Nortel in new tenders.

There have been talks about the metro network, which is very popular in the US and Europe. There is a possibility that of some deployment in 2003–04 or 2004–05. The network will help in providing multiple services like TDM, ATM, Ethernet, and data services. Currently, the capacity is not large and even the prices are on a higher side. So operators opt for CWDM as it reduces the cost of deployment while providing similar functionality.

Pravin Prashant

Page(s)   1  

Print Comment Email DiggDigg DeliciousDel.icio.us RedittReddit
CDMA MOBILE PHONES: A Chicken-egg Situation
FIXED PHONES: Crushed by a Juggernaut
TELECOM SOFTWARE: Adieu Slowdown!
 

Subscribe to our Newsletter
Name:
Email Address:




 

Current Issue

Click here to book your copy now







Your Opinion Matters

Does cloud computing cast a cloud on the future of IT professionals?

Is your Accounts Payable Solution working for you? Think Again…


   CIOL Services
IT News | IT Jobs | IT Outsourcing | IT Shopping
 



  For Voice&Data Print Subscription
  [ Magazine Subscription ]  [ Contact Info ]  [ Media Kit ]

 
Other CyberMedia web sites
[Dataquest]  [PCQuest]  [CIOL]  [Living Digital]  [CMR India]
[DQ Channels]  [The DQweek]  [CyberMedia Events]
[CyberMedia Digital]  [Cyber Astro]  [CyberMedia India]
[Global Services]  [BioSpectrum]  [BioSpectrum Asia]  [DARE]
[Computer Shopper]   [College Buying Guide]   [Technology Review

CyberMedia India Ltd

 
  Copyright © CMIL. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.
Usage of this web site is subject to terms and conditions.
Broken links? Problems with site? Send email to
webmaster@ciol.com