Absence of an Interconnect Agreement
|

|
| "Operators planning to jump
in, will have to re-access the total regulation, technology, cost and
internal environments, and future evolution of the technology"
Rohit Chandra, director, marketing & technical solutions,
Ericsson |
A cellular service provider opting for the fourth slot will
have a tough time in the absence of an interconnect agreement between CMSP and
FSP. The companies bidding for the fourth operator in CMSP will have to continue
with the bidding process in the absence of an interconnect agreement, though
this is uncertain. This affects the business model of companies, as the
contribution from long distance calls (STD and ISD) cannot be accounted for
while making the business model. In the absence of a proper interconnect, the
companies will have a tough time in the bidding process as interconnect revenue
is a major component of the total revenue.
|
License Fees for FSP |
| Circles |
Entry fee
(in Rs crore) |
|
Andhra Pradesh |
35 |
|
Delhi |
50 |
|
Gujarat |
40 |
|
Karnataka |
35 |
|
Maharashtra (Mumbai & Goa) |
115 |
|
Tamil Nadu (Chennai) |
50 |
|
Haryana |
10 |
|
Kerala |
20 |
|
Madhya Pradesh (Chattisgarh) |
20 |
|
Punjab |
20 |
|
Rajasthan |
20 |
|
UP West (Uttaranchal) |
15 |
|
UP (East) |
15 |
|
West Bengal (Kolkatta) |
25 |
|
Andaman & Nicobar |
1 |
|
Assam |
5 |
|
Bihar (Jharkhand) |
10 |
|
Himachal Pradesh |
2 |
|
Jammu & Kashmir |
2 |
|
North-East |
2 |
|
Orissa |
5 |
In the distant past, the FSP have already signed the
interconnect agreement with BSNL/MTNL, but CMSP are still negotiating and they
have not been able to resolve the differences, inspite of TRAI’s mediation
based on the principles of non-discrimination and level playing field. The CMSP
have been saying that the FSP are sharing revenues with BSNL/MTNL in the ratio
of 60:40, whereas the CMSP are not getting any revenue share from long distance
call charges, which they collect from the subscribers and pass on to BSNL/MTNL
for the termination of calls. Recently, TRAI has recognized that CMSP incur
collection costs and bad debt for collection of long distance calls, which they
pass on to the FSP for carrying the call. TRAI has determined that CMSP will
keep five percent of the revenue as their share to cover the cost of bad debt
and collection costs.
The regulator feels that the interconnect issue between CMSP
and FSP will take a minimum of eighteen months, as the two service providers are
unable to come to a mutual agreement. Talking about the delay, MS Verma,
chairman, TRAI, said that in the absence of the mutual agreement, the regulator
has to come out with a standardized accounting system for both FSP and CMSP,
approved by the Institute of Chartered Financial Analysts of India and the
Institute of Cost and Work Accountants of India. Once the accounting system is
out, the service providers will take time to switch to the standardized
accounting system. One year of operation in the standardized accounting system
will help the regulators to examine the different components, before formulating
the revenue sharing arrangement for the calls originating from CMSP and
terminating in FSP. So the fourth cellular service provider will have a tough
time in making their business model in the absence of interconnect.
Next Page : Six Operators in One Go
Page(s) 1 2 3 4 5 6