Dual Technologies under One License
This part of the consultation paper was triggered by a move by Anil Ambani,
chairman of Reliance Communications, who wanted to strengthen GSM initiatives in
the country. But a large section of the remaining industry is strongly moving
against this.
AUSPI and ISPAI are in support of Reliance Communications. A
licensee using one technology may be assigned additional spectrum meant for
another technology under the same license, SP Khanna, secretary general, AUSPI
says.
|
Strong
Foot on Spectrum Size after M&A |
|
Operators
and Associations |
Views |
|
COAI |
15 MHz would be incorrect |
|
AUSPI |
Should not exceed 15+15
MHz in one service area |
|
TTSL, Reliance |
Existing ceiling of 15
MHz for the merged entity is appropriate |
|
MTNL |
15 MHz for GSM-GSM
merger, 10 MHz for CDMA-CDMA merger |
|
Vodafone |
There should be no
spectrum cap |
According to MTNL, in response to the TRAI consultation paper,
status quo should be maintained. However, fresh allocation of spectrum for
deploying alternate technology may be decided based on the availability of
spectrum, keeping in view the requirement of spectrum of existing operators as
per the WPC guidelines.
Bharti Airtel and Vodafone have vehemently opposed such moves.
In the case of a cross technology merger between GSM/CDMA, the merged entity
must be required to choose its technology path and it cannot follow two growth
paths under the same license/entity, according to Bharti Airtel. Bharti is
supported by COAI.
Vodafone is furious about this initiative. Any attempt to even
consider a cross allocation of spectrum would offer parties a backdoor entry to
create another network (without obtaining a new license). This would have the
potential to destroy the structure of the sector.
There is a separate growth path for each technology, according
to Reliance. Operators wishing to deploy the second technology should be
allocated spectrum as is allotted to any other operator. The operator using the
alternate technology should be given preference due to the existing network
availability and better rollout capabilities so that the limited spectrum can be
utilized quickly and more efficiently.
According to BSNL, an operator has the choice of technology, and
once technologies are selected an operator must continue with it. However, the
same operator may be permitted to operate in other LSAs with the change of
technology under a new license.
|
Spectrum
is the Need of the Hour |
|

|
|

|
|

|
| Anil
Ambani, chairman, Reliance Comm |
|
Sanjeev
aga, MD, Idea Cellular |
|
RSP
Sinha, CMD, MTNL |
Spectrum Allocation Criteria
After keeping silence for close to a year, service providers are back in
action on the spectrum allocation criteria. This time, all operators are dancing
to the same tune, growing the market and driving higher traffic.
BSNL voices at least 20+20 MHz spectrum should be reserved for
each existing operators. Once the spectrum requirements of existing operators
are fully met as per their entitlement on the date of considering initial
allocation of spectrum to new licensees and their future spectrum requirements
is fully safeguarded to the maximum prescribed limit, as per spectrum
availability road map, the government may allocate the spectrum to new
operators.
The lonely voice is from ISPAI. The allocation of spectrum
should be in terms of first come first served basis. There should be no
preference to existing licensees.
Page(s) 1 2 3 4