If there can be ten forms of government in the world, how do you expect to
have a single global wireless standard, asked a few zealous market movers after
ITU dropped the "single standard" objective from its IMT 2000 agenda.
They may be right in their own way.
With no supplier or regional standard lobby committed to the users’
interest, this is one compromise ITU had to make to at least, move ahead. But
let us not forget that this "compromise" in no way undermines the
noble objective with which ITU started—end users’ convenience.
And that was sacrificed for the time being. ITU was handicapped. Suppliers
lobby was not interested.
But when people wanted to come closer to each other, even the Berlin Wall
could not stop them. What is suppliers’ infighting?
Today, there is a renewed hope. And it is known as Software Defined Radio (SDR)
or simply software radios.
What does SDR promises?
When in Rome, do as Romans do. Simply put, this old adage
will now hold true for your cellphone. You can carry your GSM phone from India
to the US, and it will still work with the IS-95 CDMA networks over there. SDR
enables the phone to change according to the environment, notwithstanding the
modulation techniques that the network uses. Not only that, it will work with
all the future standards, and even the non-cellular wireless standards, such as
802.11 and bluetooth.
|

|
|
The top-level view is a
simple representation of an entire information transfer thread. The left
side interface is the air interface. The right side interface is the wire
side and user interface. The next level view identifies a fundamental
ordered functional flow of four significant and necessary functional areas—front-end
processing, information security, information processing, and control. It
is noted that diagrams and processes discussed within this document,
unless otherwise specified, are two-way devices (send and receive). |
While users can look forward to the convenience of what many
compare with the "the change from a typewriter to a word processor",
the regulators and spectrum managers are excited, because they feel it will in
some way help them to manage
the imminent spectrum crisis of the future, as new 3G networks come in with
multiple standards and the wireless usage surges. The FCC of the US, the most
influential regulator certainly feels so. In September 2001, FCC adopted a rule
change
to facilitate the deployment of SDR technology. And already, many feel this
could be one of the major landmark decisions of FCC after Reed Hundt’s
decision to auction airwaves in 1996.
SDR Forum (www.sdrforum.org), an industry group formed with
an objective to promote the commercial usage of SDR, lists out the major
advantages of SDR. According to the forum, SDR allows:
-
End-users to realize ‘true’ choices with ‘pay as
you go’ features, device independence and a single piece of scalable
hardware that is, at once, compatible at a global scale
-
Network operators to differentiate their service
offerings without having to support a myriad number of handhelds and to move
to adjacent markets as well as offer new, tiered services to increase their
revenue mix
-
Infrastructure suppliers to reduce cost and insure
themselves against price-erosions through concentrated efforts on a common
hardware platform and reduced component counts
-
Application developers to enhance value, without concern
to hardware types
-
Terminal providers to add features, patches and
capabilities, to devices for broader market participation
What is SDR?
"The term Software Defined Radios (SDRs) is used to
describe radios that provide software control of a variety of modulation
techniques, wide-band or narrow-band operation, communications security
functions (such as hopping), and waveform requirements of current and evolving
standards over a broad frequency range. The frequency bands covered may still be
constrained at the front-end requiring a switch in the antenna system",
according to the SDR Forum.
Simply put, many basic functions, including the generation of
the transmitted radio signal that has traditionally been carried out in hardware
moves to software, in SDRs. And software, by its very nature, is programmable.
This allows SDRs to
be programmed. That gives them the flexibility that everyone needs, badly.
SDR Architecture
|

|
|
The figure shows the SDRF open architecture of the seven independent subsystems interconnected by open interfaces. |
SDR architecture as outlined by the SDR Forum is based upon a
high-level generic model with specific functional blocks connected via open
interface standards recommendations. The SDR architecture supports three
specific domains—handheld, mobile, and base-station (or fixed site). The
software is implemented by controlling the characteristics of equipment or
device subsystems through hierarchical and peer-level modules that support
scaleability and flexible extensions of applications. Modularity is the key to
successful implementation of software applications, within open systems. Between
modules are defined interfaces that are subject to standardization. Within a
module the developer is free to implement functionality in the most effective
way.
The figure below illustrates a high-level hierarchical
functional model for SDR systems. Three views of increased complexity are
presented. The top-level view is a simple representation of an entire
information transfer thread. The left side interface is the air interface. The
right side interface is the wire side and user interface. The next level view
identifies a fundamental ordered functional flow of four significant and
necessary functional areas—front-end processing, information security,
information processing, and control. It is noted that diagrams and processes
discussed within this document, unless otherwise specified, are two-way devices
(send and receive). Note that the functional model as shown in this figure is
not intended to show data or signal flow.
Front-end processing is that functional area of the end-user
device that consists generically of the physical air (or propagation medium)
interface, the front-end radio frequency processing, and any frequency up and
down conversion that is necessary. Also, modulation or demodulation processing
is contained in this functional block area.
Information security is employed for the purpose of providing
user privacy, authentication, and information protection. In the commercial
environment, this protection is specified by the underlying service standard
while in the defense environment, this protection is of a nature that must be
consistent with the various governmental doctrines and policies in effect.
Content or information processing is for the purpose of
decomposing or recovering the embedded information containing data, control, and
timing. Content processing and I/O functions, map into path selection (including
bridging, routing, and gateway), multiplexing, source coding (including vocoding,
and video compression/expansion), signaling protocol, and I/O functions.
The SDR architecture consists of functions connected through
open interfaces, and procedures for adding software-specific tasks to each of
the functional areas. The software necessary to operate is referred to as a
software application. The figure shows the SDRF open architecture of the seven
independent subsystems interconnected by open interfaces. In this view, the
generalized SDRF functional architecture has been particularized by equating a
subsystem definition to each functional area. In general, this is not the case;
subsystems will be determined by implementation considerations. Interfaces exist
for linking software application-specific modules into each subsystem. Each
subsystem contains hardware, firmware, operating system, and software modules
that may be common to more than one application. The application layer is
modular, flexible, and software-specific. The common software API layer,
inferred in the following figure, is standardized with common
functions having open and published interfaces. Peer-to-peer interfaces are
neither required nor proscribed by the SDRF.
The Obstacles
Industry observers feel there are a few obstacles that have to be removed
before SDR is widely deployed. First and the most important, since it directly
concerns the end user, is the increased power consumption. With most of the
functions moving to software, there is a need for faster processing, which
increases power requirements. This needs to be eliminated or minimized before
SDR is deployed.
Also, in tightly regulated markets, where the licensing is done on the basis
of frequency (most markets) and type of services (developing markets like
India), many regulators would not be very comfortable with a device that changes
frequencies—that too, in such a wide range. So regulatory approval may be a
roadblock in many countries.
Despite these obstacles, the advantages of SDRs far outweigh the
disadvantage. The SDR Forum forecasts commercial deployments in many markets in
the next two to three years. Analysts feel markets with multiple wireless
technologies may be the first ones to adopt. That makes American and a few Asian
markets, the potential areas for SDR deployment.
With the FCC approval, the regulators have woken up to the need of SDR. One
only hopes the Oftels and TRAIs would follow.
Prepared with major inputs from SDR Forum’s primer on SDR.
Page(s) 1