Friday, February 10, 2012
Google  
Web voicendata.com
 RSS | Archive    
 Home > Interviews > Flexibility to use in off-grid areas, and potential to carry equipment higher than a cell tower attracts telcos to high altitude wind solution
  INTERVIEWS
Flexibility to use in off-grid areas, and potential to carry equipment higher than a cell tower attracts telcos to high altitude wind solution
Pierre Rivard, CEO, Magenn Power
Heena Jhingan
Monday, November 02, 2009
Print Comment Email DiggDigg DeliciousDel.icio.us RedittReddit

Several telcos in India are now experimenting with multiple sources like solar, wind, gobar gas energy, and biofuel from molasses. Some equipment vendors are charting comprehensive programs to enable high volume deployment of wireless base stations, powered by alternative energy sources, to address mobile operators' increasing demand for energy-autonomous and green wireless networking equipment. Canadian wind energy solution provider, Magenn Power, CEO, Pierre Rivard, tells about the company's innovative product that is catching telcos' eyes, as a new generation and clean solution to replace diesel generators, and for use of energy in remote locations. Excerpts

Green is the buzz word in telecom industry today. What opportunities do you think wind energy holds for operators to go green?
Anywhere you need electrical power, there is an opportunity to go green. In particular, telecom towers in rural areas can benefit from autonomous supply of power from wind energy. This will be especially true in cases where there is no grid power near the tower, and where fossil fuel powered generators are used. Considering fuel transportation and other costs, there could be a strong motive for telecom companies to go green. Solar might not be a great solution at such sites, depending on climate and other considerations.

What is the response to your product from telecom operators across the world willing to exploit goodness of wind energy? What kind of investments are they making on deploying wind energy solutions?
Magenn receives inquiries from telecom companies interested in our novel Magenn Air Rotor System (MARS) for use in the field. MARS is a tethered, helium filled wind turbine that is related to airship technology. It elevates to 300 meters above ground and rotates on a horizontal axis, and the rotation is converted to electricity by on-board generators. The unit has thousands of pounds of buoyant lift, and can carry telecommunications equipment aloft, while providing autonomous power from steady winds that exist in most locations at 300 meters elevation.

MARS is viable in many places around the world as conventional wind turbines. Given this flexibility, plus potential to carry equipment higher than a cell tower, and you can see why telecom companies are interested. They view MARS as a way to not only power telecom relays, but also to lift up antennae higher and expand 'line of sight' coverage, reducing number of cellular phone relays needed.

By law, carriers have to maintain 911 service for thiry-six hours during black-out, which they are challenged to maintain on batteries alone. Renewable energy, albeit intermittent, is viewed as a way to extend duration.

MARS alpha prototype generated 2 kW of electrical power; further testing is being done to bring the power output to 10 to 12 kW.

This is a large market opportunity for Magenn, there are 8,00,000 cellular tower sites in the US alone, and many more in rest of the world.

Can you brief us on your clients from telecommunication industry?
We are currently in confidential negotiations with some companies, that we expect to continue over next year or so. The telecom clients would be big name multinational companies, but as agreements are under discussion and will not be finalized until a subsequent stage, we unfortunately cannot disclose names of these potential clients

What potential do you see for wind energy as a solution for telecom service provides to cut down on energy bills?
The telecom service providers know their power requirements better than we do, but there seems to be considerable potential for synergies between telecom and wind companies, especially if you can expand the potential number of good wind sites from about 13% of world's land mass to 45%-this will be possible with MARS.

How is MARS more efficient than conventional wind power solutions?
The technical advantage of MARS is to make wind power possible in locations where it is not feasible with conventional wind turbines, due to more constant winds that prevail at 300 meters above the ground; and to allow higher capacity factors (percentage of turbine's power generating capacity that is used).

MARS is intended as a renewable energy source for industrial customers seeking to replace diesel generators, or who need to use energy in remote locations. Unlike fixed turbines, it's not as dependent on factors such as availability of open space. It can also be floated above tree lines to access strong and constant wind. Traditional wind power works best on flat land, where there are fewer obstructions to block wind flow. However, only about 15% of earth's land mass is flat. MARS technology can help provide wind power in areas that are not flat.

More importantly, it is a low cost electricity solution at under 15 cents per kWh; it has fewer limits on placement location, as its coast line placement is not necessary. It is ideal for off grid applications or where power is not reliable. Due to its ability to reach greater winds at higher altitudes, it can be placed closer to demand centers, reducing transmission line costs and transmission losses.

Who are your competitors in this space, especially when it comes to solutions for telcos?
There are no direct competitors, because no other company has a method of elevating telecom equipment and providing power at the same time. In terms of simply providing local autonomous power, we would be competing against diesel, solar, and manufacturers of small wind turbines (most of which would have 20 to 40 meters hub heights).

If we look at RoI and efficiency, how would you convince a telecom service provider that MARS is a better solution for power than conventional diesel run BTS?
This is a relatively straightforward calculation, for example, ten year ownership cost of MARS, including estimated capital costs and maintenance relative to cost of diesel power at the same site. We take into account wind conditions at the site. The initial cost of diesel is always lower, but usually after three or four years, MARS would have paid for itself through reduced use of diesel.

Heena Jhingan
heenaj@cybermedia.co.in

Page(s)   1  

Print Comment Email DiggDigg DeliciousDel.icio.us RedittReddit
We plan to appoint more social networking principles internally
Instead of me managing my people, they manage me...
Direct access to infrastructure of each member country would improve connectivity
 

Subscribe to our Newsletter
Name:
Email Address:




 

Current Issue

Click here to book your copy now







Your Opinion Matters

Does cloud computing cast a cloud on the future of IT professionals?

Is your Accounts Payable Solution working for you? Think Again…


   CIOL Services
IT News | IT Jobs | IT Outsourcing | IT Shopping
 



  For Voice&Data Print Subscription
  [ Magazine Subscription ]  [ Contact Info ]  [ Media Kit ]

 
Other CyberMedia web sites
[Dataquest]  [PCQuest]  [CIOL]  [Living Digital]  [CMR India]
[DQ Channels]  [The DQweek]  [CyberMedia Events]
[CyberMedia Digital]  [Cyber Astro]  [CyberMedia India]
[Global Services]  [BioSpectrum]  [BioSpectrum Asia]  [DARE]
[Computer Shopper]   [College Buying Guide]   [Technology Review

CyberMedia India Ltd

 
  Copyright © CMIL. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.
Usage of this web site is subject to terms and conditions.
Broken links? Problems with site? Send email to
webmaster@ciol.com