Device
India's device (handset, customer premises equipment) space seems to see
some traction, but nothing on a global scale. Indian companies have not been
able to capture the domestic market and MNCs still rule the roost. Some of the
Indian equipment makers have tried coming up with 'me too' and 'low cost'
devices ( i-Mate, XL Telecom, Karbonn, Ray, Maxx, Byond, Spice Mobile, etc) but
most of them have not been able to capture the market due to lack of R&D or QA
or branding/marketing or all of these.
Comparatively, China has large domestic device manufacturers that have much
stronger hold on the domestic market. They spend close to 10% of their annual
revenues on R&D, and employ on an average 30% of their total workforce in R&D.
Chinese companies are aggressively spending on developing handsets that can
support emerging technologies and are customizing these devices for telecom
operators to support emerging technologies such as 3G and others (W-CDMA and TD-SCDMA).
Some of them have also started working on the next gen technologies like LTE and
4G. Indian device manufacturers can take cues from Chinese makers and focus
heavily on R&D, and branding efforts.
While on the other hand R&D captives of leading global device makers like
Nokia, Ericsson, Samsung, Motorola etc, have used India as a hub for R&D
focusing on user centric technologies and developing devices that can be used in
the domestic market. Nokia's India R&D center is working on chipsets for
high-end mobile devices and is focused on next generation packet-switched mobile
technologies and communications solutions to enhance corporate productivity.
Ericsson's R&D center in India is involved in developing mobile prepaid,
convergent charging solutions, and mediation products. Similarly, captives are
doing a lot of work from China as well. Nokia, for instance, is conducting R&D
on a mobile infrastructure and to develop mobile applications based on 3G and IP
multimedia subsystem (IMS) for both Chinese and global markets from their
Chengdu center. Motorola's China R&D Institute (MCRDI) works on value added
applications, 2G, 3G technologies, and 4G (including LTE and related migration
solutions).
Indian IT services firms are at the forefront of this technology space with
firms like Wipro, Satyam, Infosys, HCL, MindTree, Tech Mahindra, etc, are
providing high-end R&D services to telecom companies. Indian IT companies have
worked with global device makers on numerous upcoming products such as Nokia on
RAC (radio access configuration) for managing elements of 3G networks, for
development of latest set-top boxes for companies like Motorola and numerous
other projects.
A couple of Indian device makers are trying hard to compete with the global
brands and coming up with products that support emerging technologies. Micromax
is one such Indian company that has come up with the cheapest 3G enabled device.
It has a development center in Gurgaon that works on building customized mobile
phones for the Indian market. To compete with the global biggies in the long-run
and build sustainable products, Micromax has plans of setting up an R&D center
in Shanghai with an investment of $10 mn by December 2009. With the
establishment of a new development center in China, Micromax plans to reduce the
development time of mobile phones. Initiatives like these from a few more device
makers would result in Indian companies competing on the global stage.
Wireless Carrier Network
Globally, operators like BT, AT&T, NTT DOCOMO, China Telecom, Verizon, and
France Telecom have invested in developing technologies or through technology
tie-ups. Indian telecom operators like Airtel, RCOM, BSNL, Vodafone, Idea, Tata
Teleservices do not have a major technology focus. Indian telecom operators
don't seem to be building on any expertise in the emerging technologies, and
this could affect them in the long-run, especially when it comes to next gen
technologies. Instead outsourcing is a big theme in India. Airtel has outsourced
management of both their wireline and wireless networks. On the other hand, in
countries like Japan and China, telecom operator have focused on technologies
and aggressively initiated R&D efforts. One of the Japan's leading telecom
operator NTT DOCOMO is spending heavily on R&D of LTE and 4G technology. China's
leading operator, China Telecom has made significant investments in R&D space
for developing mobile technology, Internet services, and the company also
focuses on end customer demands and experiences.
Enabling Software and Services
Carrier class solutions are software products implemented at the
carrier/telecom operator centralized systems. These include operational support
systems (OSS) to business support systems (BSS). India has witnessed a lot of
innovation when it comes to OSS and BSS software applications. The number of
homegrown companies have developed cutting-edge products in the OSS/BSS space
that have captured market share globally. Subex Azure is one such company. It is
globally recognized for its products and its clients including thrity-two of the
world's fifty largest telecommunications service providers. Some of the other
well known OSS/BSS solution providers from India include Suntec, Bharti Telesoft
(now Comviva), Aricent, Elitecore, etc. Interestingly, Indian companies have
been able to sell their products globally.
|
 |
Note: Red color bubble indicates Product Development
capability/innovation. Shade indicates the extent or amount of product
development/innovation
Note 1: In the Indian wireless telecom market component, device, carrier
class solutions space is dominated by the MNC's whereas infrastructure,
wireless carrier (Network) and VAS space is dominated by the Indian players |
Content and Portal Services
India has seen tremendous growth in the mobile value added services (VAS)
space in the last couple of years. A large number of Indian VAS companies have
been able to come up with innovative services in the mobile VAS space.
Traditionally, what started off from P2P SMS based (Bollywood and cricket)
services has moved on to services like m-Search, video clips, m-Commerce, etc,
and is going from strength-to-strength. Unlike most of other components in the
value chain, homegrown Indian companies dominate the mobile VAS space. But again
this is a 'software space'.
Mobile VAS can be split into three categories-information, entertainment, and
m-commerce. Indian VAS companies have performed well across all these
categories. They have innovated and at the same time have constantly introduced
customer centric services. They have also gone global and acquired companies
from around the world. Indian VAS companies like Mauj, OnMobile, Cellnext,
Indiatimes, Rediff, etc, have been able to develop innovative services and
solutions. IMImobile developed DaVinci service delivery platform which
integrates and encompasses all messaging platforms, voice and video platforms,
operational support system (OSS), business support system (BSS), gateways, and
administration and application interfaces. It has also come up with Ad-Ring
fully integrated mobile advertising platform in which multi-format ad campaigns
can be created and delivered to consumers via SMS, MMS, voice, WAP portal, CRBT
and video streaming.
OnMobile has developed VAS product and solutions ranging from contest
management and aggregation, m-commerce solutions to voice portals, and voice
SMSs. Other companies like Rediff developed search engines on mobile phones and
other value added services. This helped them increase their customer base and
switch about 25% of the Rediff users to use mobile phones for Internet usage.
Again this shows Indian companies proving their mettle in the software space,
but not complete products such as mobile phones and equipments.
Conclusion
India has been able to drive innovation when it comes to developing
'software' products and technologies in the telecom space. But it has failed to
develop complete products in the core (especially non-software technologies) in
the telecom space. Now, with several years of experience in providing R&D
services and gaining financial strength this is the right time for some of the
large players in this field to start focusing on building a complete telecom
product from India.
The telecom hardware equipment market is much bigger than the telecom
software market. To stamp its authority in the global telecom market, India
needs to build globally competitive companies across the telecom value chain.
Amit Goeland Gaurav Vasu
The authors are founder, and senior consultants, Knowledgefaber respectively
vadmail@cybermedia.co.in
Page(s) 1 2