Politically correct. Those were the words that described last
year's union budget. With more emphasis on agriculture, infrastructure, and
education, there was a concerted effort to keep a large part of the society
happy. From an industrial perspective, telecom has been cornered in the last few
budgets, despite being a vital component in the country's growth. But the
scenario may be different this year. 2007-08 has proved to be a path-breaking
year for the Indian economy. The Sensex made headlines through the year, and is
still on the climbing mode, fluctuating once in a while. The Indian rupee was on
a mission to conquer the dollar, and during the third quarter of the year, this
race affected the whole economy in a negative manner, especially the IT and ITeS
industry.
The growth in the telecom sector alone has been humungous. With
a mobile teledensity around 20%, there are 210 mn subscribers in the country
today. The subscriber base is growing at a rate of 8 mn subscribers per month.
Mobile companies have invested about Rs 80,000 crore in various projects, and
this investment is still growing at a rate of 12% per annum. Telecom has also
contributed to the growth in manufacturing and R&D sectors. Brands like
Nokia, Samsung, LG, and Motorola have established their manufacturing facilities
in the country.
Telecom operators are now rolling out services in rural areas
where cost of providing services is higher, per capita income is lower, and
potential end users have a reduced purchasing power. This is the only sector in
India that has continuously absorbed inflation and, today, provides the most
affordable mobile services in the world. Mobile service providers are making
huge commitments toward aggressive rollout of services in rural and remote areas
in order to facilitate the achievement of the government's objective of 250 mn
subscribers by 2007 and 500 mn by 2010.
When industry associations say there is need for a critical
examination of the philosophy of application of duties and levies on telecom,
which is an important requirement for ensuring sustainable and accelerated
growth of the sector, they are very right. It is now difficult to overlook the
growth and opportunities in the telecom sector. Telecom is going to play a key
role in the years to come. Though fulfilling all the demands may not be
feasible, the finance minister should lay down a proper strategy regarding
telecom.
Unified Tax System
A unified tax system seems to be topping the list of demands. In the earlier
budget, the government recognized the problem of a multiple tax structure and
asked the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) to come up with a study for a
unified tax proposal. However, this remains pending and the industry is eagerly
waiting to hear something regarding this in this year's budget.
"Implementation of a single tax will address several demands of the
industry arising out of different anomalies suffered by manufacturers, both
during DTA sales and in exports. Therefore, we recommend uniform single taxation
across the country, facilitating free movement of goods and reimbursement of the
same at the point of exports," says Rakesh Malik, secretary general, TEMA.
Revenue Sharing License Fee
In 2006 the government reduced the revenue sharing license fee, including
USO contribution for long distance services to 6% from the earlier 15%, which is
still effective. The demand for further reduction was made last year also and
the industry sticks to this demand. Currently, the Telecom Access Service
Providers are paying a high percentage as license fee through a revenue sharing
model. This revenue share ranges between 6-10% of Adjusted Gross Revenue (AGR)
per annum, depending on the category of licensed circle service area.
|
 |
 |
|
"The opportunities in
telecom manufacturing remain largely untapped as competing countries offer
greater incentives. India will need to put in place greater incentives,
rationalizing the current system of excise duties, taxes and other levies
to correct anomalies hindering manufacturing and distribution" |
"The budget should
include extension of ATIA benefit for the telecom industry and relief from
service tax. Existing service tax is not beneficial as this levy acts as
an additional burden on the telecom service providers" |
|
Naresh
Wadhwa, president and country manager, India and SAARC, Cisco |
Col HS Bedi, MD, Tulip IT Services
|
"It is of utmost necessity to reduce the license fee from
the present level in view of the fact that presently, in addition to the license
fee (6-10%) and the spectrum fee (2-6%), service providers pay service tax of
12%," says SC Khanna, secretary general, AUSPI. Khanna is demanding
reduction in unified service license fees also: "In line with this decision
of reduction in revenue share license fee for long distance services, there
should be reduction in license fee to 6%, including the USO levy for Unified
Access Service Licensees (UASLs) as well so as to maintain a level playing field
condition among service providers.
Why USO?
Service providers contribute a uniform levy of 5% of the AGR toward the USO
Fund. The levy was necessary to subsidize service providers to roll out services
in the rural and remote areas. "With expansion of mobile services, the
growth is now seen only in the rural and remote areas, thus effectively bridging
the digital divide," says Khanna. It was also observed that during the
bidding for the USOF support for setting up and managing infrastructure sites
and provision of mobile services, many service providers, including PSEs, were
ready to provide services without subsidy. The levy collection has increased
manifold and the fund remains unutilized every year. With an estimated
collection of Rs 4,500 crore in the year 2007-08, cumulative balance, as of now,
has reached an approximate of Rs 14,000 crore.
The demand for reduction was also made before last year's
budget but, this time, it has been further strengthened by a TRAI recommendation
in this regard. TRAI, even in its recent recommendation to the government, has
said that for covering 75% of development blocks in service areas there should
be a reduction in the contribution to the USO Fund to 3%. AUSPI suggests a
two-step reduction in USO Fund contribution. In the first step, reduce the
contribution to 3% this year and next year the contribution to the fund should
be zero.

|
|
The
Fuss about the Fund |
|
Year |
USO Fund collection
(Rs crore) |
Fund allocated
and disbursed (Rs crore) |
|
2002-03 |
1,653.61 |
300.00 |
|
2003-04 |
2,143.22 |
200.00 |
|
2004-05 |
3,457.73 |
1,314.58 |
|
2005-06 |
3,533.29 |
1,766.85 |
|
2006-07 |
4,211.13 |
1,500.00 |
|
2007-08 |
4,500.00
(estimated) |
Rs 293.77 crore
disbursed against allotment of Rs 1,800 crore |
|
Spectrum Charges
In India, annual spectrum usage charge is 2-6% of AGR of the service
provider, which is very high compared to some Asian countries like China, Sri
Lanka, and Pakistan. The amount of spectrum usage charges collected as royalty
from operators offering mobile services has been increasing over the years and
the amount for FY 2006-07 is estimated to be about Rs 2,100 crore. It is
estimated that telecom subscribers pay a total of about 30-35% as taxes and
levies including spectrum usage charges. Again this demand is pending for years
and crops up every time before the budget. "To provide affordable services
to subscribers so as to meet the projected teledensity target, it is suggested
that spectrum usage charges be brought down to 0.5% of the AGR, just to recover
the cost of administering and regulating the spectrum resource," says
Khanna.
Export of Services
There is a contradiction between the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) and the
Service Tax Law over the issue of export of services under the Service Law.
Under the Export of Services Rules 2005, any service provided by a service
provider is treated as export and exempted from service tax, if services are
provided from India to be used outside, and payment for services is received in
convertible foreign exchange.
The law approves provision of roaming facility by an Indian
telecom operator to the customer/subscriber of a foreign telecom operator while
the customer/subscriber is in India. FTP recognizes this service as export,
eligible for benefits provided under the policy. However, as per the Service Tax
Law, such a service does not merit exemption, as services are provided in India.
Similarly, services provided in India relating to exports are recognized as
exports under the FTP, while the same does not merit exemption under the Service
Tax Law. "The government should come up with a clear stand and clarify the
issue regarding applicability/non-applicability of withholding tax," says
Malik.
Interconnection Usage Charges
This does not bring any revenue for the government, and industry
associations feel that it should be called off. Interconnect usage charges are
not in the nature of fees for technical service, but for allowing the call from
one service provider to be carried over to the other service provider. As such,
the existing telecom service providers have to provide interconnection of their
networks, equipment to the networks, and equipments of the new telecom service
providers to provide subscribers efficient and flawless service. These
interconnection issues between service providers are very crucial for DoT and
TRAI.
Page(s) 1 2