 |
Print this article |
 |
Comment This |
 |
Email this article |
|
The GSM Association (GSMA) believes that the cost of mobile
networks and devices will continue to fall, enabling affordable mobile services
to people on very low incomes.
In many developing countries, mobile penetration is strongly
correlated with economic growth and social benefits. Governments and other
stakeholders should therefore encourage the mobile industry to provide
communications for all by lowering mobile-specific consumer taxes and removing
regulatory bottlenecks.
Universal service funds have been adopted by governments in many
developing countries, with the aim of improving access to telecommunications.
Points to Ponder
Mobile networks now cover 80% of the world's population, double the level
in 2000. This can be attributed almost exclusively to investment by mobile
operators and the liberalization of telecom markets by governments. By 2010, 90%
of the world will be covered by mobile networks.
Thirty two of the 92 developing countries surveyed have set up
universal service funds, which levy contributions from mobile and fixed
operators, to subsidize the rollout of telecommunications networks in rural
areas. The levy is typically set at 1–2% of gross or net revenues, although a
minority of funds collect a considerably higher amount, with the highest being
5% of gross revenues. To date, 15 of the 32 universal service funds have
collected more than $6 bn from the telecommunications industry, of which $2 bn
has come from the mobile industry. The remaining 17 funds are expected to levy
fees soon, or have only recently begun to do so.
Only 27% ($1.62 bn) of the $6 bn that has been collected has
been redistributed to the telecommunications industry to aid network expansion.
The remaining 73% remains unallocated and unspent.
Universal service funds distribution has had little impact on
improving market penetration, primarily because most of the money spent (93% of
the $1.6 bn) has been on extending fixed-line networks, which are relatively
expensive. In comparison, only 5% or $75 mn has been allocated to mobile
networks, 6 which are far more cost efficient to deploy than fixed-line
networks.
Opportunities
Mobile operators could extend coverage to an additional 450 mn people (7% of
the world's population) living in rural areas, if the unallocated $4.4 bn
universal service funds levies were invested into mobile network rollout.

Universal service funds will extract a further $3.8 bn from the
telecoms industry by the end of the decade. If 100% of this money was spent on
increasing mobile network reach, a further 382 mn people, (6% of the world's
population) would have mobile coverage.
If the unspent $4.4 bn universal service funds levies and the
further $3.8 bn that will be collected between now and the end of the decade
were spent on extending mobile networks, mobile coverage would be near 100%
within 3.5 years. Countries collect universal service funds from the mobile
industry but invest in fixed networks. It prevents the mobile industry from
being able to serve less well-off consumers through the delivery of sustainable
and affordable mobile services.
|
Case
Study: India
India's universal
service funds collect an average of 5% from mobile operators' gross
revenues each year, but the majority of mobile operators are excluded from
receiving any of the funds. Most of the fund disbursements are allocated
to the incumbent, BSNL.
Since 2002, India's
universal service funds have collected around $3 bn and have allocated
less than 29% of the money. The amount retained to date is close to $2 bn
and is predicted to rise still further. The mobile industry is being
deprived of resources that it could otherwise use to invest in network
rollout and meet universal service objectives.
Despite this, India's
mobile network coverage doubled last year to reach over 60% of the
population. A raft of changes to the regulatory environment supported this
expansion. The introduction of a 'calling party pays' regime in 2003,
for example, has had a significant impact on network rollout and service
take-up, as has the further liberalization of the sector. India now has
six to eight major mobile operators in all services areas. India has a
mobile penetration rate of 11%, and this is growing rapidly as operators
provide more affordable services. India's average pre-paid ARPU is $ 5.
The mobile sector has been held back by
some of the world's highest taxes, such as 5 – 10% license fees and 2–6%
spectrum fees levied on operators' adjusted gross revenues. Mobile
operators also pay an access deficit charge of 1.5%, which is equivalent
to approximately $750 mn annually. This fee is re-distributed to the
fixed-line incumbent. India is an intensely competitive market; per minute
call charges are among the lowest in the world. High duties and regulatory
charges, combined with low prices means mobile operators have low free
cash flows, which holds back further expansion in rural areas. |
Page(s) 1 2