Supporting Mobility and
Automation: The obvious aspect where a wireless network excels above
wired is mobility. Having the ability to connect anywhere, anytime is a powerful
motivator for wireless. However, the biggest downside to having the wrong
pervasive WLAN design is the ongoing tuning and reconfiguration of the network.
If the WLAN system requires RF planning tools to deploy, this
will be an ongoing task. Adding new desktops, moving an employee, or even
renovating a part of the office building in a way that was not originally
predicted, will change the RF environment and, therefore, require changes to the
network. If those changes are not handled by the system automatically, the IT
manager must manually intervene with software tools. This process is commonly
referred to as RF spectrum management and is the bane of IT staffers' lives.
| Typical scenarios of WLAN
deployment in a small-to-medium sized business |
|
Scenario
1 |
|
Supports |
Up to
32 users |
|
Equipment |
Two 802.11b or
802.11b/g access points |
|
Throughput |
Up to 11Mbps for
802.11b
Up to 54Mbps for 802.11g |
|
Security |
WPA2-PSK VPN gateway
for remote access |
|
Wired network access |
Broadband ISP or
leased T1 |
|
TCO/benefit ratio |
$20,000 TCO to deliver
a benefit of $300,000 over a three-year period |
|
As per application
needs, two 802.11b or 802.11b/g access points can be sufficient to
support up to 32 WLAN users, with traffic routed through a four-port
hub. If the office has fewer than 15 WLAN users, the second access
point can allow for future growth while serving as a failover device
in case the first access point malfunctions.
A small gateway
capable of 2 Mbps throughput serves as an optional VPN gateway for
remote users to log in to the company network. A broadband ISP or a
leased T1 line would typically provide up to 1.5 Mbps of bandwidth-coupling
well with the bandwidth provided by the gateway and wireless access
points. Since the WLAN can easily keep up with the Internet
connection, you get the benefits of wireless without worrying about
introducing bottlenecks into the network. |
|
|
Source: Intel |
|
|
Scenario
2 |
|
Supports |
Up to
150 users |
|
Equipment |
Twelve 802.11b or
802.11b/g access points |
|
Throughput |
Up to 20 Mbps to
company network;
Up to 11 Mbps for 802.11b
Up to 54 Mbps for 802.11g |
|
Security |
WPA2 with RADIUS
server for authorization and authentication and VPN gateway for
remote access |
|
Wired network access |
Leased line |
|
TCO/benefit ratio |
$60,000 TCO to deliver
a benefit of $1,000,000 over a three-year period |
|
By deploying twelve
802.11b or 802.11b/g access points, a medium-sized business can
support up to 150 wireless users at Ethernet-like speeds. The VPN
gateway is capable of 20 Mbps throughput and enables remote users to
log into the company network via VPN.
In this scenario, a
series of switches aggregate and manage traffic from the wireless
access points, which connect to the Internet over a leased line. The
access points can be powered by Power-over-Ethernet (PoE) using the
Category 5 cable connecting access points to the wired network-resulting
in significant cost savings in construction and wiring for each
access point. |
|
|
Source: Intel |
Mobility needs to be supported at two different levels-link-layer
and IP-layer. 802.11 specifications support link-layer mobility by providing a
mechanism for a client to detect new access points and switch across access
points based on signal strength measurements.
Handoff Between APs:
When a client roams from one access point to another, the time between
disconnecting from the first access point and reconnecting to the second access
point is non-zero. For some clients, this process can take up to several
seconds. If a micro-cell configuration is deployed to increase throughput, then
this handoff problem is exponentially worse.
One should bear in mind that there are inherent limitations to
the number of connections to an access point. A good rule of thumb for designing
is that each access point can support 20-30 simultaneous users. Applications
that don't demand high bandwidth and/or low latency will suffer performance
when the number of simultaneous access point users is too great. How the access
points connect to the backbone is important as well.
The Right Tools
Wireless LAN applications continue to mature in features and usability.
Higher speeds, increased security, quality of service (QoS) and centralized
management are just a few of the wireless developments in the past few years,
and more advances are coming. On the operational side also the configurations
and the security settings are quite simpler compared to other managed
technologies.
| Non-unified WLAN
Architecture |
|

|
| The wired and wireless
networks remain separate, with the interface between the two being a
standard Ethernet connection |
What enterprises need are WLAN systems that are designed
specifically for pervasive Wi-Fi access in enterprises. These systems are cost
effective as they handle the issues of pervasive WLAN deployment automatically,
require no RF planning, do away with quality-killing handoffs, can eliminate
interference problems and enable greater scalability.
Centralized AP management has become a popular method of
wireless installation that moves all intelligence from the APs to an appliance.
A centralized wireless deployment allows for the Virtual LAN (VLAN) to be
extended over the existing wired network. Configuration changes are applied at
the management switch instead of at each AP. Since the APs are communicating
with a central device, advanced capabilities, such as automatic channel and
power configuration and rogue detection, are possible. In addition, each thin AP
generally costs significantly less than its more feature-rich cousin.
The downside to a centralized model is the up-front costs. The
central management switch is usually expensive. However, if the deployment
involves many APs, or wireless expansion is anticipated in the future, the
up-front costs of a centrally managed application are often eclipsed by the
benefits.
Page(s) 1 2 3