Compliance for Better Cabling
The new trends in copper have made component-level compliance
to standards very important.
As one goes up from Cat 5e to Cat 6 and so on,
component-level compliance as per the ratified standard becomes a crucial
factor. The testing process of a Cat 6 solution is more rigid than that of Cat
5e. The technology used in Cat 6 is different than that in Cat 5e. In Cat 6, all
the four pairs are used as against Cat 5e where mostly two pairs are used to
achieve 100 Mbps. In Cat 6, one has to measure losses in all the four pairs with
power sum effects.
Also, as one moves from Cat 5e to Cat 6 and higher, the
installations become more difficult and stringent. New parameters make field
testing more complex such as equal-level far-end crosstalk (ELFEXT), powersum
equal-level far-end crosstalk, and alien crosstalk. For these, we need highly
skilled installers and field testing equipments that have Level 4 specification
on all components and give accurate results as proposed by ISO/IEC to test Class
F links.

Component-level compliance really enables interoperability
among vendors. With Cat 6, this is very much required, as several vendors
launched solutions initially that could not be interchanged with other vendors
products. Fortunately, Cat A6 is only an addendum to the current Cat 6
specification, and designs at the component level should already be
interchangeable. That being said, sellers of full end-to-end solutions will be
focusing on global infrastructure solutions and talking about full systems with
components in full compliance.
One must note here that component-level compliance will not
necessarily lead to channel compliance. Hence, equal emphasis has to be given to
both component and channel compliances with standards. As the rated frequency
increases from Cat 5e through Cat 6 to Cat A6, the emphasis on all parameters,
including component/channel compliance increases.
Next Page : Gigabit Connectivity-Fiber Vs Copper
Page(s) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9