The health and performance of an enterprise network is largely dependant on
the way an enterprise manages it. Network management is much more challenging
today because not only they are a complex set of devices and applications but
also because of their ever-growing size.
Challenges
The network is doing much more today: Enterprise networks today are doing
much more than what they were doing earlier in terms of the number of
applications that run on them and growing number of users who access them.
Also, enterprise networks are today not only being accessed by internal users
but by external people (business partners, suppliers, customers etc.). All this
is leading to an exponential increase in network traffic. And as network traffic
grows and as the requirements for redundancy, performance, and mission-critical
applications grow networks are generating huge and often complex sets of
statistical information also.
Network's more complex: Enterprise networks are much more complex then they
were earlier as a result of the growing complexity of various network elements.
The increased complexity has led to explosion of statistics and configuration
information. The data generated does not always provide useful information for
effective network management. In fact, the growing volume of data is adding to
complexity of network management. The challenge here is to find relevant data
for any given problem.
Too many silos: Enterprise network managers usually try to look at
infrastructure management, security management, and storage management in silos
such as: network management, systems management, database management,
applications management, Web server management, threat management, identity and
access management, security incident management, data protection, or storage
resource management etc.
A lot of different element managers are deployed to handle these different
domains resulting in different functional groups within the IT organization.
This leads to a lot of delay in pinpointing the problems in the IT
infrastructure and subsequently a delay in resolving them. There is an apparent
mismatch between what is perceived by these different functional groups and the
end users. This phenomenon is known as the fallacy of availability. Considering
the expectations and demands of availability, performance, and service levels
from the business side; the above strategy becomes inadequate in today's
context.
VoIP management: VoIP has introduced two major challenges: coping with the
increase in network traffic and ensuring reliability and appropriate service
levels to support enterprise VoIP applications. The challenge is for the network
to have the ability to deliver a toll-quality voice.
To meet the needs for voice traffic, the network must be able to provide QoS
features such as classification, queuing, and prioritizing the voice traffic.
Within the LAN environment, QoS for voice traffic is not an issue as bandwidth
is abundant and cheap. A VoIP conversation requires 64 kbps, much lower than the
100 Mbps available per user over a LAN. The challenge is to implement QoS on
VoIP traffic over the WAN, as the bandwidth over WAN is expensive.
VPN: The challenge is again security and how to protect your internal users
from being infected with viruses from external users (business partners,
suppliers, customers etc).
Tips
• It would be best for network managers to go for a single, central
management platform that can take care of the entire network. The management
platform should not only have the ability to provide relevant and accurate
information on what is going on the network but should also do it without
affecting the performance of the network. A good network management platform
should also provide high levels of visibility to all the critical network
elements.
• The
use of remote monitoring and management services has emerged as a platform for
optimized service delivery to manage the evolution, administration and
availability of the corporate IT infrastructure. Remote monitoring and
management is also mutually beneficial proposition: lower costs for the provider
and reduced price points for the customer.
• Most of the data generated by the network elements are at the
informational level. They can be avoided in normal operational conditions. The
network elements can be fine-tuned to generate only relevant information along
with data aggregation. This will help in reducing the man-hours required for
analysis and storage space. Another important aspect of network management is
the ability to correlate events/alarms that are generated.
• It is important to look at whether standards-based, open APIs such
as XML are supported on the network devices that allow network managers to
flexibly define and collect statistics as per their needs.
• Integration of management platforms for different products such as
routers, switches, firewalls, intrusion detection and prevention systems,
wireless devices, etc. is a critical aspect of today's networks. This requires
that the management platforms selected have open APIs for integration.
• Network and systems management is no longer just about monitoring
the health and availability of your enterprise network and systems. It's about
prioritizing network and system management events based on their impact on the
business. It's about analyzing events to predict and prevent problems before
they occur. It's about self-managing systems that dynamically re-allocate
over-utilized resources to under-utilized devices. It's about managing on
demand.
|
To
Outsource or Do it Yourself?
|
| The
enterprise's risks with do-it-yourself network management and
the promise of network management under a managed service
arrangement |
| In-house
Risk |
Managed-Services
Promise |
| Vendor
lock |
In
utility-based service |
| Sticker
shock |
Lower
entry: pay as you go |
| Implementation
failure |
Implementation
burden on the MSP* |
| Inadequate
impact analysis |
Impact
is Organizational |
| Cost
of capital |
No
capital outlay |
| IT
anarchy |
Structured
processes |
|
Source: Gartner
2003 *managed service provider (MSP)
|
|
• It is important to do a baselining exercise for the network to learn
its normal behavior. As long as the normal behavior of the network is not
properly understood, no meaningful data/events can be generated. Also, the
network managers should be aware and be up-to-date on any new application/host's
introduction into the network. The network manager should also make sure that
capabilities such as event/alarm correlation and alarm/event aggregation are
available on the management platforms.
• For technologies such as VoIP, network management platforms should
be capable of collecting parameters such as network latency and jitter etc., to
provide the network administrator insight into how the network is behaving and
if the voice traffic can be carried with the assured quality. These are
real-time challenges that network administrators and the network components must
be equipped to handle. Video traffic will task the network even harder.
• The security readiness of the network is one of the most important
parameters for a mission-critical network. Security management includes
maintaining and monitoring the baseline (normal operating condition) of the
network and monitoring the network for any unauthorized host and applications
added to the network. Effective user authentication, authorization, and
segmentation mechanisms should be in place for controlling access to the
enterprise resources.
• There are different levels of security management. Baselining the
network and setting threshold alarms and events are managed through the network
management system. Managing security policies that get pushed into the various
security products such as firewalls, intrusion detection and prevention system,
IP Sec encryption management, SSL-VPN etc., should be managed separately since
the skill sets and the expertise required for these are different from the
network management skill sets. Also, the security policy definition and
monitoring should be handled by a select set of people to avoid any leakage of
information. As much as possible, security mechanisms that lighten the load of
the network administrator, while increasing overall protection, should be
considered.
Outsourcing Network Management
Managed network services and network management outsourcing can play key
roles in reducing TCO. Under these arrangements cost reductions can come from a
variety of sources. For example, an outsourcing arrangement can minimize a
company's financial exposure when it comes to technology investments. A service
offered under an outsourcing agreement usually comes with equipment that is
owned and managed by the provider. This eliminates the high start-up costs
typically associated with subscribing to a new service and minimizes the risk of
early equipment obsolescence.
In cases where the equipment malfunctions, repairs or replacements are
accomplished at no cost to the subscriber. Even upgrades that are required to
accommodate additional access lines are available at no cost to the subscriber.
Outsourcing allows companies to reduce their own head count. With staff more
engaged with strategic responsibilities, instead of daily network operations,
the company can prepare for technology migrations, thoroughly test new
productivity tools before making them available to employees over the WAN, or
build self-service applications that customers can access over the Internet with
Web browsers.
• Making the Decision
Determining the need for an outsourcer should only come after careful
consideration of the following issues.
- Is the network infrastructure up-to-date?
- Can the capital expenditure be handled?
- To what extent is TCO reduction a concern?
- Is network performance currently an issue?
- Can the technical staff be better used elsewhere?
- Are there any regulatory mandates that need to be addressed?
- What needs to be managed?
Having answers to these questions will also help in selection
of the right kind of management provider.
Another issue concerns what has to be managed-voice
systems, the data network, or both? Perhaps migration to a converged voice-data
network is a possibility in the future. If so, the management provider must be
up for the challenge.
A related issue concerns the scope of the management service:
should it include just the premises equipment, access lines, transport, or all
of these?
• Selecting a Network Management Provider
- The evaluation of potential management providers should
reveal a well-organized and staffed infrastructure that is enthusiastic about
helping to reach the company's networking objectives.
- When network faults occur, the most critical thing is restoring service to
end-users. A savvy network executive will enlist a service provider with SLAs
addressing the 'mean time to restore'. Restoring service should be the
measured goal.
- Competent integrators will insist on performing a due diligence survey
that includes an inspection of the current logical and physical configurations
of a company's network.
- With carrier-diversity becoming an essential ingredient of business
continuity planning, reliance on multiple transport providers is likely to
become the norm for large corporate networks.
- Capable network integrators will provide details on how faults are
detected and isolated, stepping you through a few common scenarios.
- Security is most often a joint responsibility of the company and its
management provider. The company will usually have responsibility for physical
security at its locations, limiting access to sensitive areas like the data
center, equipment rooms, and internal cabling. The management provider will
have responsibility for the network all the way up to and including the
firewall and intrusion detection system. Establishing firm boundaries of
responsibility will eliminate finger-pointing when security problems surface
later.
- The management provider must appreciate how network events correlate to
the client's business processes. If a circuit goes down it should not be seen
as merely a 'link down' alarm. Instead, it should interpret this alarm as,
"Customer is losing $10,000 per minute in e-commerce transactions until
this circuit is fully restored to service." The management provider
should have the same level of awareness when it comes to security.
(Extracted from an MCI white paper)
|
Experts
Panel |
|
Bithin
Talukdar,
market development manager, HP Software
Dheeraj Sinha, head, IT, Apollo Tyres
Jason Phoon, senior manager, product marketing, Allied Telesyn
Ninad Karpe,
managing director, Computer Associates
Prasad Babu, systems engineering manager, Juniper Networks
Ranajoy Punja,
VP marketing, India and SAARC, Cisco Systems,
Satish Mohan,
head, engineering, Red Hat India
|
|
|
|
Next Page : Wireless LAN Management
Page(s) 1 2