Saturday, February 11, 2012
Google  
Web voicendata.com
 RSS | Archive    
 Home > GOLDBOOK 2003 > WIRELESS LAN: Mobility’s Growing Wings
  GOLDBOOK 2003
WIRELESS LAN: Mobility’s Growing Wings
Continued from page: 1

Sunday, March 30, 2003

Homework for Enterprises

WLAN Issues to Keep in Mind
Range and Coverage: Range varies from 100 feet to 300 feet
Throughput: Important because its limited (theoretically 11 Mbps but actual 5.5 Mbps or even less as the bandwidth would be shared by many users)
Compatibility: with the existing networks

Interoperability of Wireless Devices: different technologies or products using different frequency bands may not interoperate. Systems from different vendors may not interoperate even if they employ the same technology and the same frequency band.

Interference and Co-existence: Co-location of multiple wireless LANs could pose problems.

Security: Difficult to snoop but not impossible, so must be addressed during installation itself.

Cost: Cost will depend on number of users and access points

Network Design: Scalability and in-building design should be taken into consideration

Battery Life of Mobile Platforms: End-user wireless products are usually designed to run off AC or battery power from their host laptop so insist on products that have design techniques that can maximize the host computer’s energy usage and battery life.

n Determine What Applications Will Run: Deploying wireless LAN is not just about mobility. An enterprise will need to address a number of issues and do a proper homework before substituting a wired LAN or complementing it with a wireless LAN. It is fine that it would increase employee mobility and that the organization has a very dynamic network that needs frequent moves and adds or that the office building does not allow frequent changes in the wiring. But before you take a decision based on these facts, something more basic would need an enterprise’s attention. Will wireless LAN suit its requirements? The answer to this question would depend on the type of applications that an organization runs or would like to run on the LAN. This is important because of limitations on bandwidth in wireless LAN networks.

n The Bandwidth Users Will Need: Practically 802.11B does not support more than 5.5 Mbps bandwidth. Moreover, in a multi-user environment, a single user cannot expect to get even this 5.5 Mbps as the bandwidth is shared with other users.

Besides, as the user keeps moving away from a wireless LAN access hub, the bandwidth output keeps on decreasing.

Naturally, all this rules out high-bandwidth applications. Wireless LAN throughput is sufficient for applications like electronic mail exchange, access to shared peripherals like printers, Internet access, and access to multi-user databases and applications.

Lack of Standards Force Laptop Vendors to Support Multiple Standards

Today most laptops manufacturers are embedding their notebooks with wireless chips that support multiple WLAN standards like 802.11a, 802.11b and 802.11g. IBM, Toshiba and NEC are already shipping notebooks embedded with multimode Wi-Fi chip (that support both a and b version of WLAN), and HP is making laptops with its 802.11a, 802.11b and 802.11g combination chip.

This is happening because the WLAN equipment industry is still not united on supporting a single standard. So there are products in the market based on three 802.11 specifications—802.11a, 802.11b and 802.11g. Each has its own advantages and industry support, which makes it difficult for laptop manufacturers to totally ignore any one specification. 802.11b was the first specification to be introduced and is currently the most popular with both manufacturers and consumers and hence widely deployed WLAN standard. The 802.11a standard offers faster network speeds than 802.11b, but is incompatible with 802.11b. Meanwhile, 802.11g is compatible with 802.11b, and has faster network speeds, but may not support as many access points to networks in crowded environments as the 802.11a standard can.

The limitations on bandwidth also means that wireless LAN, despite its other visible advantages, cannot be expected to replace the traditional wired LAN.

Identify Hard-to-wire Spaces: Wireless LAN is best suited for organizations where the number of users is less and where mobility is more important than throughput. In other words, wireless LAN with its current performance levels, is primarily meant for laptop carrying senior management functionaries who do not run any bandwidth hungry application or indulge in development work but need to be mobile. Besides, wireless LAN can be and is being used to provide connectivity in hard to wire places, for example, corridors, lobbies, conference rooms. Wireless LAN can also be used to provide connectivity in temporary premises, makeshift offices, site offices etc. Offices which have lots of laptop carrying visitors too can look for wireless LAN deployment.

Number of Access Points Needed: An important consideration should be the interior design structure of the site where wireless LAN is going to be set up.

Most wireless LAN systems use RF. And the distance over which RF waves can travel is not the function of the product alone. It also depends on the propagation path of RF. Even though RF waves are capable of penetrating most indoor walls and other physical obstacles, their range of coverage surely depends on the indoor architecture of the building. In open spaces each wireless LAN access hub can cover up to 300 feet, while in places with physical barriers-like walls, a hub could be effective in the range of 130 feet only. This would naturally mean that access points are placed strategically as such to overcome all physical barriers inside the building. Otherwise users would not be able to enjoy the advantage of mobility or roam around freely in a building with their connected laptops. "The enterprise should get the site survey conducted for verifying the coverage and estimating the number of wireless LAN access points required at the premise. This would depend on the topology of the location and the amount of throughput required.

EXPERTS PANEL

Amit Kumar, national marketing manager, Tata Telecom
Lt Col H S Bedi, managing director, Tulip IT Services
Next Page :

Wi-Fi Alliance—Defending against Security Challenges

Page(s)   1  2  3  

Print Comment Email DiggDigg DeliciousDel.icio.us RedittReddit

Read resource on other segments

 

Subscribe to our Newsletter
Name:
Email Address:




 

Current Issue

Click here to book your copy now







Your Opinion Matters

Does cloud computing cast a cloud on the future of IT professionals?

Is your Accounts Payable Solution working for you? Think Again…


   CIOL Services
IT News | IT Jobs | IT Outsourcing | IT Shopping
 



  For Voice&Data Print Subscription
  [ Magazine Subscription ]  [ Contact Info ]  [ Media Kit ]

 
Other CyberMedia web sites
[Dataquest]  [PCQuest]  [CIOL]  [Living Digital]  [CMR India]
[DQ Channels]  [The DQweek]  [CyberMedia Events]
[CyberMedia Digital]  [Cyber Astro]  [CyberMedia India]
[Global Services]  [BioSpectrum]  [BioSpectrum Asia]  [DARE]
[Computer Shopper]   [College Buying Guide]   [Technology Review

CyberMedia India Ltd

 
  Copyright © CMIL. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.
Usage of this web site is subject to terms and conditions.
Broken links? Problems with site? Send email to
webmaster@ciol.com