Who would argue that the Right to Information (RTI) Act has problems, and we
should either go slow on it, or review it? Politicians, bureaucrats and the
babus, who now have to part with public information free, for which they charged
hefty amounts earlier, are already doing the best they can do to dissuade people
from using the RTI Act. It is a combination of intimidation and mindless
application of the letter of the law that threatens to dissuade citizens from
putting this Act to use. And politicians are only happy to offer solutions that
only dilute the law's purpose.
It was very recently that a babu in a Chhattisgarh village handed over a bill
of Rs 1,82,000 to a farmer who had asked for information on paddy purchases.
This was photocopying charges because the information he wanted covered
thousands of pages. In another incident in Bilaspur town, a person was told to
pay Rs 75,000 for information he had requested on the positions available for
school teachers. In many cases officials claim they have no problem in giving
information, but need money to buy equipment and paper to provide that
information. One state chief minister has said that the rich are exploiting the
RTI Act for getting information, and there should be change in the law to allow
the officials to examine whether the requested information is useful for the
person asking for it.
While media is carrying regular news about how citizens of Delhi and Mumbai
are using the RTI Act to get the babus moving, just a few cases do not make much
difference to the lives of crores of citizens.
Denial of the RTI Act is not just affecting ordinary citizens, but it will
hit the IT and communications industry too. If this Act is implemented in its
letter and spirit, industry experts hope to see that sale of PCs, photocopiers,
scanners, IT consumables et al will go up significantly. Similarly, Internet
subscribers, mobile users, fixed line phone connections will all go up sharply.
Unfortunately, there are quite a few reports coming in where vendors and
service providers are actually hands in glove with the Government. The objective
is to win large e-Gov orders so that vendors are happy, and provide solutions
which are so complicated or un-economical in the long run, that after sometime,
it is all scrapped. A case in point comes from a district in Maharashtra, where
despite several failed attempts to start Internet kiosks for the benefit of
villagers, it has been completely ignored. This is because the big and
influential vendors have the officials in their pockets. And lots of money is
being wasted.
The vendors might have picked up an order, but what they do not realize is
that in the process they have hit the nerve of the RTI Act. They are creating
hurdles for faster adoption of the RTI Act, rather than facilitating it. They do
not realize that they are actually hitting the communications and IT industry
itself. The entire approach in e-Government selling will have to be vastly
different from corporate selling. Here the industry has to actively participate
in market development, a crucial role they want to bypass, before it starts
bearing fruits. Smaller players, who best understand local needs, habits, and
conditions, will have to be taken along if RTI and e-Governance has to succeed.
There is clearly a stake that the industry has in the success of the RTI Act.
And, therefore, the industry must play an active role in pushing for the
implementation of this Act. And, if they see e-Gov as a golden goose, then we
all know how the story ended.

ibrahima@cybermedia.co.in
Page(s) 1