Last month, MTN, the South-Africa-based mobile operator with about 70 mn
customers worldwide became a known name in India. First there was talk of a deal
with Bharti Airtel. The deal fell through pretty quickly because of structuring
problems-and the possible dent to Indian pride as a result. Essentially Bharti
Airtel refused to become a subsidiary of MTN. Literally hours later, Reliance
Telecom started its negotiations with the MTN group. If these succeed it will
create a telecom company with 120 mn subscribers which would be the world's
fifth or sixth largest. Though talks are still on, what is of interest is that
none of the US-based companies was seen to be interested. Apart from India,
mobile operators from China and the Gulf countries were also reported to be keen
to have a partnership with MTN.
In a manner of speaking, the development is logical. Asia and Africa are the
fastest growing telecom markets in the world, and there is no reason why there
should not be deals amongst them. On the other hand, there is a fear that this
urge to merge would strain the balance sheets of the Indian companies. Bharti
Airtel's shares dropped in the Indian market when the talks started. Reliance
Telecom has been more stable but it has been threatened a lawsuit by Reliance
Industries-as two of the richest Indians keep needling each other.
There is a clear change emerging in the pecking order of the mobile-telephony
world and a coming of age for the Asian companies. The deal with MTN could be
worth $20–30 bn. It compares with the Verizon Alltell deal of $28 bn, which will
make Verizon the largest US wireless carrier. Because China and India, in that
order, are the world's fastest growing mobile markets, the mobile companies in
these are also expected to take the lead in overseas investments.
|
 |
|
Shyam malhotra
editor-in-chief
VOICE&DATA shyamm@cybermedia.co.in |
According to analyst and consulting firm, Ovum, China and India are slated to
be the two single largest markets by 2012, accounting for 31% of the world's
mobile connections. Ovum forecasts mobile penetration to reach 64% in China and
55% in India by 2012, which still leaves immense growth potential in both
markets. Global Insight, another consulting firm, has also predicted that of the
1.2 bn predicted new mobile subscribers by 2011, 60% will come from China and
India. If India has Bharti Airtel (68 mn subscribers), Reliance Communications
(46 mn), and BSNL (40 mn), China is way ahead with China Mobile (392 mn) and
China Unicom (168 mn).
Overseas acquisitions can help Indian companies beef up revenues-and
bottomlines. The Indian market gives ARPUs of $10 per month. International
markets give $100 per month. The rates of calls, text messages, and value-added
services in India are among the lowest in the world. Volumes drive market growth
in India-though there is greater scope to expand domestic operations, the ARPU
is not expected to rise to the levels available in the West.
Indian companies are more cost-efficient than their Western
counterparts-infrastructure sharing; outsourcing operations like customer
service, network deployment and IT services; and focusing on prepaid customers
help Indian companies to lower their administrative costs and build lean
organizations. They could hope to use some of the tricks they have learnt in an
intensely competitive market at other locations also. Venturing abroad through
acquisitions and partnerships does have significant advantages in this scenario.
Indian companies will gain access to new subscribers, products, and
technologies; it will also provide economies of scale.
Along with expanding domestic operations, therefore, Indian companies are
well poised to take the overseas leap. Provided they can get over the problems
of pride and ego.
Page(s) 1