The term “IP Storage” is generally used to refer to a storage area
networking solution that uses standard Ethernet connectivity in some way. These
solutions typically fall into one of the two categories: Those that use an
Ethernet link to interconnect Fibre Channel SAN environments via gateways; and
those where a SAN is built using Gigabit Ethernet infrastructure instead of
Fibre Channel.
Consequently, IP, storage solutions typically extend and complement existing
SAN environments, or they provide affordable new SAN storage solutions in parts
of the IT infrastructure that are still dominated by direct-attached storage.
The benefits shared by all IP storage solutions derive from advantages
associated with standard Ethernet networking:
 |
| Using IP Storage to Interconnect SAN
Islands |
- Mature, well-understood technology with a long history of plug-and-play
interoperability
- Low costs through commodity economics
- Strong roadmap to 40Gb and beyond
- Reliable, fault-to learn, with built-in quality of service
- Routable transport with no distance limitations
- Flexible provisioning and configuration
- A broad range of proven management tools
- Enormous knowledge and experience base-expertise in every IT organization
Taken all together, IP, storage solutions greatly broaden the options
available to IT executives to address the cost, availability, performance and
manageability issues caused by continual, data growth, and to accelerate their
transition from yesterday's direct-attached storage architecture to
tomorrow's networked Storage model.
Interconnecting Fibre Channel SANs
Two IP storage-bridging protocols are available to provide the basis for
interconnecting existing Fibre channel SAN environments. The use of IP networks
here is typically to overcome the distance limitations of Fibre Channel; to
provide lower cost solutions than using proprietary protocols over private fiber
links; and to enable ubiquitous remote data protection and disaster recovery
solutions.
|

|
| T Typical IP SAN
Environment using iSCSI |
FCIP is a TCP/IP-based tunneling protocol designed to transparently provide
point-to-point connections between geographically distributed Fibre Channel SANs
using FCIP gateways to connect to an IP network. It is particularly well suited
to provide connectivity to remote SANs for backup and restore, or remote data
replication applications.
iFCP is a TCP/IP-based protocol for interconnecting storage devices or Fibre
Channel SANs using an IP infrastructure. IFCP solutions consist of Fibre Channel
end-points connected to an IP network by means of iFCP gateways. It is
particularly well suited to providing the reliable transport of storage data
suited between separate SAN domains via TCP/IP LAN, MAN or W WAN infrastructure.
IP-Native SANs
In contrast, the iSCSI protocol enables the creation of complete SAN
solutions based on Gigabit Ethernet, instead of Fibre Channel, network
infrastructure. iSCSI is simply the combination of two very well-understood
technologies: SCSI block storage commands running over a TCP/IP transport. The
iSCSI protocol is an industry standard protocol (RFC 3720) created, maintained
and ratified by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).
iSCSI is interesting as a SAN alternative to direct-attached storage in
environments where simplicity attached simplicity, flexibility,
price/performance, and availability of administrative staff are critical IT
decision factors, iSCSI SAN solutions (often called IPSANs) consist of iSCSI
initiators (software driver or adapter) in the application servers, connected to
iSCSI storage systems by means of standard Gigabit Ethernet switches and cables.
IP SANs are deployed for all the same reasons that Fibre Channel SANs are
typically deployed as an alternative to direct attached storage.
| iSCSI
provides the basis for SAN storage solutions (primary storage) in
environments where it was not considered to be feasible or cost effective |
According to IDC, the top reasons are:
Back: 46.0%
Storage consolidation: 40.0%
Satisfy on-going demands for additional capacity: 37.0%
Performance: 31.0%
Disaster recovery: 27.0%
New project or application deployment: 23.0%
Today backup and storage consolidation in the face of rapid, data growth are
the primary reasons for considering an IP SAN, followed by the intention to
implement an affordable disaster fordable recovery solution.
Page(s) 1 2